This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Clinical and morphological assessment of bone quality in the dental implantation zone in patients with osteoporosis
1 North Ossetian State Medical Academy, Vladikavkaz, Russia
2 Khetagurov North Ossetian State University, Vladikavkaz, Russia
Correspondence should be addressed: Albert B. Akkalaev
Pushkinskaya, 40, Vladikavkaz, 362019, Russia; ur.xednay@888853psa
Author contribution: Akkalaev AB — study concept and design, academic advising, manuscript editing; Abdullaeva RR, Aliev MR, Mustafaev RG — clinical material collection, literature review, manuscript writing; Bedoeva AA, Mironova AA, Khugaeva VF — morphological material processing, analysis and statistical processing of the results; Kadieva LM, Munapova KKh — clinical support of patients, preparation of materials, manuscript writing.
Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the North Ossetian State Medical Academy (protocol No. 2 dated 12 February 2026). All the subjects submitted the informed consent for participation in the study, diagnostic and invasive procedures, and personal data processing.
Systemic osteoporosis is one of the most significant systemic factors capable of worsening bone tissue quality and affect osseointegration of dental implants. The increase in the number of patients of older age groups in need of implant treatment determines high clinical significance of preoperative assessment of the implant bed condition in this category of patients. The study aimed to assess clinical and morphological features of bone tissue in the dental implantation zone in patients with osteoporosis and determine the correlation of those with the primary stability of implants and early marginal bone remodeling. A total of 84 patients aged 55–75 were included in a prospective pilot study, who were planned for implantation in the areas of maxillar and mandibular premolars and molars: 42 with the confirmed systemic osteoporosis and 42 having no signs of osteoporosis. All the patients underwent CBCT with the bone quality and type determination in accordance with the Lekholm and Zarb classification; histological and histo-morphometric analysis of bone biopsy specimens was performed in a subgroup of 32 patients. Primary stability was assessed by the resonance frequency analysis; clinical monitoring was conducted after 2, 6, and 12 months. The D3–D4 type bones were more often found in patients with osteoporosis, along with lower bone density and implant stability quotient (ISQ) values, reduced bone volume fraction (BV/TV), trabecular thinning, and increased RANKL/OPG ratio. There was a positive correlation between the BV/TV, radiological bone density, and primary stability of implants. Systemic osteoporosis degrades the implant bed quality, therefore, the implantation protocol personalization and comprehensive preoperative assessment are required.
Keywords: dental implantation, osteoporosis, bone quality, histomorphometry, primary implant stability, cone-beam computed tomography