Copyright: © 2018 by the authors. Licensee: Pirogov University.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

The competence of plastic surgeons

About authors

1 Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Cosmetology and Cell Technologies, Faculty of Continuous Professional Education,
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow

2 Department of Faculty Surgery No. 1, Medical Faculty,
A. I. Evdokimov Moscow State Medical and Dental University, Moscow

3 Department of Public Health and Healthcare,
Institute of Continuous Professional Education of the Federal Medical and Biological Agency, Moscow

Correspondence should be addressed: Valentin Vladimirovich Kochubey
ul. Delegatskaya, 20/1, Moscow, 127473; moc.liamg@yebuohcok

Received: 2018-04-24 Accepted: 2018-05-23 Published online: 2018-07-06
|

Russian system of continuous medical education does not guarantee professional development of its participants: doctors do not report the number and specifics of the operations performed, self-assess their competence and compile individual professional development plans, and the professional community does not take part in these processes. Therefore, there is a need for accurate assessment of competence of plastic surgeons and objectivity of their self-assessment. We have conducted a study in the form of a single-stage questionnaire filled by the surgeons in person. The questionnaire contained two sections. The first section offered a competence self-assessment table listing 9 plastic surgery specialties; the participants used a 5-point scoring system to state their level, where 1 meant "no experience", 2 — "beginner", 3 — "specialist", 4 — "knowledgeable", 5 — "expert". The second section contained 9 test tasks (closed, univariate) used to objectively assess the level of competence of the participants. Each correct answer added 1 point to the participant's score, wrong answers added nothing. 162 people took part in the survey. The average age of the participants was 31.5 ± 6.9 years; average length of service — 4.0 ± 4.8 years. Analyzing the data, we applied the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, Mann-Whitney test, Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman's coefficient, used ANOVA, Levene's test, Duncan test. The values were considered statistically significant at p ˂ assessment score was 2.1 ± 0.92 points. We have discovered a statistically significant (p ˂ 0.001) correlation of the length of  0.05. The overall self-service with the level of self-assessment (rs= 0.72). The average score for the second section, the tests, was 2.6 ± 1.76 points (out of 9). The correlation between the test score and the length of service was insignificant (rs= –0.08, p = 0.3); same is true for the self-assessment (rs= –0.006, p = 0.9).

Keywords: competence of plastic surgeons, self-assessment of competence by plastic surgeons, objectivity of self- assessment of competence

КОММЕНТАРИИ (0)