2019 / 04

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2019.056

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Dynamics of post-stroke hand paresis kinematic pattern during rehabilitation

Khizhnikova AE, Klochkov AS, Kotov–Smolenskiy AM, Suponeva NA, Piradov MA
About authors

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Anastasia E. Khizhnikova
Volokolamskoye Shosse 80, Moscow, 125367; moc.liamg@lapakhsutsan

About paper

Funding: the study was performed as a part of the public contract № 0512-2014-0036.

Author contribution: Khizhnikova AE — research planning, literature analysis, data acquisition, analysis and interpretation, manuscript draft writing; Klochkov AS — research planning, literature analysis, data interpretation, manuscript writing; Kotov–Smolenskiy AM — training of surveyed patients, patients examination using clinical scales; Suponeva NA — research planning, data interpretation, manuscript writing; Piradov MA — manuscript writing.

Received: 2019-08-16 Accepted: 2019-08-30 Published online: 2019-08-31
|
  1. Lawrence ES, Coshall C, Dundas R, et al. Estimates of the prevalence of acute stroke impairments and disability in a multiethnic population. J Stroke. 2001; (32): 1279–84.
  2. Persson HC, Parziali M, Danielsson A, Sunnerhagen KS. Outcome and upper extremity function within 72 hours after first occasion of stroke in an unselected population at a stroke unit. A part of the SALGOT study. J BMC Neurol. 2012; (12): 162.
  3. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8 (8): 741–54.
  4. Veerbeek JM, Kwakkel G, van Wegen EE, Ket JC, Heymans MW. Early prediction of outcome of activities of daily living after stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2011; 42 (5): 1482–8.
  5. Brunnstrom S. Movement Therapy in Hemiplegia: A Neurophysiological Approach. Facts and Comparisons. NewYork: Harper and Row, 1970.
  6. Santello M, Lang CE. Are movement disorders and sensorimotor injuries pathologic synergies? When normal multi-joint movement synergies become pathologic. J Front Hum Neurosci. 2015; (8): 1050.
  7. van Kordelaar J, van Wegen EE, Kwakkel G. Unraveling the interaction between pathological upper limb synergies and compensatory trunk movements during reach-to-grasp after stroke: a cross-sectional study. J Exp Brain Res. 2012; 221 (3): 251–62.
  8. Van Vliet PM, Sheridan MR. Coordination between reaching and grasping in patients with hemiparesis and healthy subjects. J Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; (88): 1325–31.
  9. Hogan L, Dipietro HI, Krebs SE, et al. Changing Motor Synergies in Chronic Stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2007; (98): 757–68.
  10. Compston A. Aids to the investigation of peripheral nerve injuries. Medical Research Council: Nerve Injuries Research Committee. His Majesty’s Stationery Office: 1942; pp. 48 (iii) and 74 figures and 7 diagrams; with aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. By Michael O’Brien for the Guarantors of Brain. Saunders Elsevier. Brain. 2010; 133 (10): 2838–44.
  11. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971; (9): 97–113.
  12. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, Stratford PW. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. J Gowland C Phys Ther. 1993; 73 (7): 447–54.
  13. Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. J Phys Ther. 1987; 67 (2): 206–7.
  14. Doussoulin SA, Rivas SR, Campos SV. Validation of «Action Research Arm Test» (ARAT) in Chilean patients with a paretic upper limb after a stroke. Rev Med Chil. 2012; 140 (1): 59–65.
  15. Alt Murphy M, Willén C, Sunnerhagen KS. Movement kinematics during a drinking task are associated with the activity capacity level after stroke. J Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012; 26 (9): 1106–15.
  16. Valdés BA, Glegg SMN, Van der Loos HFM. Trunk Compensation During Bimanual Reaching at Different Heights by Healthy and Hemiparetic Adults. J Mot Behav. 2017; 49 (5): 580–92.
  17. van Kordelaar J, van Wegen EE, Kwakkel G. Unraveling the interaction between pathological upper limb synergies and compensatory trunk movements during reach-to-grasp after stroke: a cross-sectional study. J Exp Brain Res. 2012; 221 (3): 251–62.
  18. Roh J, Rymer WZ, Perreault EJ, et al. Saturated muscle activation contributes to compensatory reaching strategies after stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2013; 109 (3): 768–81.
  19. Basteris A, Nijenhuis SM, Stienen AH, et al. Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014; 10 (11): 111.
  20. Daunoraviciene K, Adomaviciene A, Grigonyte A, Griškevičius J, Juocevicius A. Effects of robot-assisted training on upper limb functional recovery during the rehabilitation of poststroke patients. J Technol Health Care. 2018; 26 (2): 533–42.
  21. Ustinova KI, Chernikova LA, Khizhnikova AE, Poydasheva AG, Suponeva NA, Piradov MA. Theoretical basis for classical methods of motor rehabilitation in neurology. Annals of clinical and experimental neurology. 2018; 12 (3): 54–60.