ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Efficiency of image visualization simulator technology for physical rehabilitation of children with cerebral palsy through play

Gorelik VV1, Filippova SN2, Belyaev VS3, Karlova EV4
About authors

1 Togliatti State University, Togliatti, Russia

2 Russian State Social University, Klin, Russia

3 Moscow City Pedagogical University, Moscow, Russia

4 FGBUZ MRTs Sergievsky Mineral Waters of FMBA, Samara Region, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Viktor V. Gorelik
Belorusskaya 14, Togliatti, 445020; ur.tsil@yogcel

About paper

Author contribution: Gorelik VV — study concept and design; Filippova SN — text writing and editing, statistical analysis; Belyaev VS — manuscript editing; Karlova EV — data acquisition and processing, statistical analysis.

Received: 2019-07-19 Accepted: 2019-08-04 Published online: 2019-08-17
|
Fig. 1. Comparative data of the “Head lifting from the back position” motion test for children with cerebral palsy aged 7–9 from CG and TG obtained at the control stage of the PE
Fig. 2. Comparative data of the “Head lifting from the stomach position” motion test for children with cerebral palsy aged 7–9 from CG and TG obtained at the control stage of the PE
Fig. 3. Results of the “Trunk lifting from the back position” motion test for children with cerebral palsy aged 7–9 from CG and TG obtained at the control stage of the PE
Fig. 4. Results of the “Wrist flexion and extension” motion test for children with cerebral palsy aged 7–9 from CG and TG obtained at the control stage of the PE
Fig. 5. Results of the “Finger flexion” motion test for children with cerebral palsy aged 7–9 from CG and TG obtained at the control stage of the PE
Fig. 6. Results of the “Legs lifting” motion test for children with cerebral palsy aged 7–9 from CG and TG obtained at the control stage of the PE
Table 1. Musculoskeletal system functional status assessment results for children with cerebral palsy aged 7–9 obtained at the benchmarking stage of the PE
Note: М — average; m — standard error of the mean; p — significance of differences between.
Table 2. Musculoskeletal system functional status re-assessment results for children with cerebral palsy aged 7–9 obtained at the control stage of the PE
Note: М — average; m — standard error of the mean; TG — treatment group; CG — control group; * — significant differences between the TG and CG results, p < 0.05.