2019 / 06

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2019.089

MISCELLANEOUS

Effectiveness of multidisciplinary team as a new model of after stroke patients’ rehabilitation

Ivanova GE1,2,9, Melnikova EV1,5,8, Shmonin AA1,5,8, Verbitskaya EV5, Belkin AA1,3, Bodrova RA1,4,7, Lebedev PV1, Maltseva MN1,5, Prokopenko SV1,6, Prosvirnina MS1,8, Sarana АM1, Stakhovskaya LV1,2, Suvorov AYu1,2,9, Khasanova DR1,4,7, Shamalov NA1,2,9
About authors

1 All-Russian Union Rehabilitators, Moscow, Russia

2 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

3 Ural State Medical University of the Ministry of health, Yekaterinburg, Russia

4 Kazan State Medical Academy, Kazan, Russia

5 The First Saint-Petersburg State Medical University named after Academician I. P. Pavlov, Saint-Petersburg, Russia

6 Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia

7 Kazan State Medical University, Kazan, Russia

8 City Hospital № 26, Saint Petersburg, Russia

9 Research Center of Cerebrovascular Pathology and Stroke, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Andrey Yu. Suvorov
Ostrovityanova, 1–10, Moscow, 117342; ur.liam@vorovus_rd

About paper

Funding: Territorial Federal Compulsory Medical Insurance Fund, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation and the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation universities budget funds, All-Russian Union Rehabilitators funds.

Acknowledgements: Yulia Buryak, neurologist of Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University. Victoria Kasatkina, neurologist of City Alexandovskaya Hospital. Ekaterina Lobachyova, 6th year student of Pavlov First Saint Petersburg State Medical University

Received: 2019-11-26 Accepted: 2019-12-13 Published online: 2019-12-27
|
Fig. 1. Results of stroke patients rehabilitation at the end of the 1st stage (Pearson χ2 test; р < 0.0001)
Fig. 2. mRS assessment carried out 1.5 years after stroke (score obtained during the telephone interview)
Table 1. List of scales used in the phase 2
Table 2. Comparison of two groups of patients with stroke before the start of the study
Note: phase 1 — biomedical rehabilitation model; phase 2 — multidisciplinary patient-centered problem-oriented rehabilitation model.
Table 3. Comparison of two groups of patients with stroke before the start of the study
Table 4. Results of stroke patients condition evaluation at the end of the 1st stage of rehabilitation
Table 5. Groups of patients’ baseline indicators and results obtained during the telephone interview