CLINICAL CASE
Intolerance of preservative-containing eye drops in a glaucoma patient: diagnostic and therapeutic challenges
1 Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia, Moscow, Russia
2 Multiprofile Clinic “SM-Clinic”, Moscow, Russia
Correspondence should be addressed: Kseniya Kazakova
Miklouho-Maclay, 6, Moscow, 117198; ur.liam@inesk_averamonoP
Author contribution: Frolov MA — study planning; data analysis and interpretation; Kazakova KA, Dushina GN, Frolov AM, Gonchar PA — study planning; literature analysis; data acquisition, analysis and interpretation; manuscript preparation.
A patient presented to our clinic with stage Ia open-angle glaucoma of the right eye and stage IIa surgically corrected open-angle glaucoma of the left eye. The condition of the ocular surface was interpreted as toxic/allergic conjunctivitis provoked by brimonidine 0.15 %. Brimonidine was substituted with non-selective 0.5%; additionally, topical steroids were prescribed. After steroids were discontinued, some of the symptoms came back, including moderate hyperemia and conjunctival edema, which was interpreted as intolerance to a preservative contained in the eye drops. A decision was made to switch from the β-blocker to its preservative-free formulation; regular IOP monitoring was continued. IOP measured during the next visit was above tolerated, so a preservative-free form of the ocular hypotensive combination drug (an analog of prostaglandin 0.005% with non-selective β-blocker 0.5%) was introduced to the regimen, with further IOP monitoring. Because the initial diagnosis was wrong, damage to the ocular surface had been aggravated by inadequate therapy. Preservative-free hypotensive eye drops are beneficial for the corneal surface and have a positive effect on a patient’s adherence to the regimen.
Keywords: glaucoma, preservative, brimonidine, preservative-free form, allergic reactions