2021 / 04

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2021.037

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effectiveness of hybrid intraperitoneal mesh repair for paracolostomy hernia

Malgina NV1,2, Dolgina TYu1,2, Epifanova AD3, Rodoman GV1,2
About authors

1 City Clinical Hospital № 24, Moscow, Russia

2 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

3 Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Tamara Yu. Dolgina
Pistsovaya, 10, 127015, Moscow; ur.xednay@aramat-aniglod

About paper

Author contribution: Rodoman GV — the final version of the manuscript; Malgina NV — study concept and design; Dolgina TYu — data acquisition, manuscript draft; Epifanova AD — statistical analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Protocol № 160 dated December 19, 2016)

Received: 2021-07-10 Accepted: 2021-07-25 Published online: 2021-08-17
|
  1. Allen-Mersh TG, Thomson JP. Surgical treatment of colostomy complications. Br J Surg. 1988 May: 416–8.
  2. Israelson LA. Preventing and treating Parastomal hernia. World Journal of Surgery. 2005; 1086–9.
  3. Israelson LA. Parastomal hernias. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2008: 113–25.
  4. Hiranyakas A, Ho YH. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2010; 53 (9): 1334–6.
  5. Śmieta–ski M, Bury K, Matyja A, et al. Polish guidelines for treatment of patients with parastomal hernia. Pol Przegl Chir. 2013; 85: 152–80.
  6. De Robles MS, Young CJ.BMC. Parastomal hernia repair with onlay mesh remains a safe and effective approach. 2020; 24; 20 (1): 296. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00964-9.
  7. Tivenius M, Näsvall P, Sandblom G. Int J. Parastomal hernias causing symptoms or requiring surgical repair after colorectal cancer surgery-a national population-based cohort study. Colorectal Dis. 2019; 34 (7): 1267–72. DOI: 10.1007/s00384019-03292-4.
  8. Van Dijk SS, Timmermans L, Deerenberg EB, et al. Parastomal Hernia: Impact on Quolity of Life? World J Surg. 2015; 39: 2596– 601.
  9. Rodoman GV, Malgina NV, Razbirin VN, Dolgina TYu. Ocenka individual'nogo kachestva zhizni pacienta s parakolostomicheskoj gryzhej. Hirurg. 2019; 3–4: 14–23. Russian.
  10. Rodoman GV, Malgina NV, Razbirin VN, Dolgina TYu. Sostojanie problemy operativnogo lechenija parakolostomicheskih gryzh. Hirurg. 2016; 10 (144): 24–30. Russian.
  11. Hansson BM, Slater NJ, Schouten van der Velden AP, et al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg. 2012; 255: 685–95.
  12. Tadeo-Ruiz G, Picazo-Yeste JS, Moreno-Sanz C, Herrero-Bogajo ML. Parastomal hernias: background, current status and future prospects. Cirugía Española (English Edition). 2010; 87 (6): 339–49.
  13. Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia. 2018; 22: 183–98.
  14. Gregg ZA, Dao HE, Schechter S, Shah N. Paracolostomal Hernia Repair: who and when? Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2014: 1105–12.
  15. Szczepkowski M, Gil G, Kobus A. Parastomal hernia repair: Bielañski hospital experience. Acta chirurgica Iugoslavica. 2006; 53 (2): 99–102.
  16. Okorji LM, Kasten KR. Diagnosis and Management of Parastomal Hernias. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb; 62 (2): 158–62. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001293.
  17. Rodoman GV, Malgina NV, Razbirin VN, Epifanova SV, Dolgina TYu, Kuznecov AI. Primenenie mul'tispiral'noj komp'juternoj tomografii dlja ocenki jeffektivnosti hirurgicheskogo lechenija pacientov s parakolostomicheskoj gryzhej. Hirurgija. Zhurnal im. N. I. Pirogova. 2021; (3): 36–41. Russian.
  18. Burov NE. Kratkij obzor istorii MNOAR. K 50-letiju MNOAR. Anesteziologija i reanimatologija. 2013; (4): 77–82. Russian.
  19. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999; 100 (10): 1043–9.
  20. Sugarbacker PH. Peritoneal approach to prosrhetic mesh repair of parastomy hernias. Ann Surg. 1985; 201: 344–6.
  21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 205–13.
  22. Rodoman GV, Malgina NV, Razbirin VN, Dolgina TYu. Vybor sinteticheskogo allotransplantata dlja operacij po povodu parakolostomicheskih gryzh. Hirurg. 2018; 9–10: 3–12. Russian.
  23. The EuroQol group. EuroQol — a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy. December 1990; 16: 199–208. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/01688510(90)90421-9.
  24. Notes on the use of EQ-5D developed by the EuroQol Group, 2003, EuroQol Business Management, PO Box 4445 3006 AK Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Available from: www.euroqol org.
  25. Blackwell S, Pinkney T. Quality of life and parastomal hernia repair: the PROPHER study. Hernia. 2020; 24: 429–30.
  26. Gachabayov M, Orujova L, Latifi LA, Latifi R. Use of Biologic Mesh for the Treatment and Prevention of Parastomal Hernias. Surg Technol Int. 2020 Nov; 28; 37: 115–9.
  27. Cross AJ, Buchwald PL, Frizelle FA, Eglinton TW. Meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2017 Feb; 104 (3): 179–186. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10402. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
  28. Pich J. Prosthetic mesh for the prevention of parastomal hernias. Am J Nurs. 2019 Apr; 119 (4): 49. DOI: 10.1097/01. NAJ.0000554548.93403.64.