2021 / 04

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2021.037
Copyright: © 2021 by the authors. Licensee: Pirogov University.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effectiveness of hybrid intraperitoneal mesh repair for paracolostomy hernia

Malgina NV1,2, Dolgina TYu1,2, Epifanova AD3, Rodoman GV1,2
About authors

1 City Clinical Hospital № 24, Moscow, Russia

2 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

3 Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Tamara Yu. Dolgina
Pistsovaya, 10, 127015, Moscow; ur.xednay@aramat-aniglod

About paper

Author contribution: Rodoman GV — the final version of the manuscript; Malgina NV — study concept and design; Dolgina TYu — data acquisition, manuscript draft; Epifanova AD — statistical analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Protocol № 160 dated December 19, 2016)

Received: 2021-07-10 Accepted: 2021-07-25 Published online: 2021-08-17
|
  1. Allen-Mersh TG, Thomson JP. Surgical treatment of colostomy complications. Br J Surg. 1988 May: 416–8.
  2. Israelson LA. Preventing and treating Parastomal hernia. World Journal of Surgery. 2005; 1086–9.
  3. Israelson LA. Parastomal hernias. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2008: 113–25.
  4. Hiranyakas A, Ho YH. Laparoscopic parastomal hernia repair. Diseases of the Colon & Rectum. 2010; 53 (9): 1334–6.
  5. Śmieta–ski M, Bury K, Matyja A, et al. Polish guidelines for treatment of patients with parastomal hernia. Pol Przegl Chir. 2013; 85: 152–80.
  6. De Robles MS, Young CJ.BMC. Parastomal hernia repair with onlay mesh remains a safe and effective approach. 2020; 24; 20 (1): 296. DOI: 10.1186/s12893-020-00964-9.
  7. Tivenius M, Näsvall P, Sandblom G. Int J. Parastomal hernias causing symptoms or requiring surgical repair after colorectal cancer surgery-a national population-based cohort study. Colorectal Dis. 2019; 34 (7): 1267–72. DOI: 10.1007/s00384019-03292-4.
  8. Van Dijk SS, Timmermans L, Deerenberg EB, et al. Parastomal Hernia: Impact on Quolity of Life? World J Surg. 2015; 39: 2596– 601.
  9. Rodoman GV, Malgina NV, Razbirin VN, Dolgina TYu. Ocenka individual'nogo kachestva zhizni pacienta s parakolostomicheskoj gryzhej. Hirurg. 2019; 3–4: 14–23. Russian.
  10. Rodoman GV, Malgina NV, Razbirin VN, Dolgina TYu. Sostojanie problemy operativnogo lechenija parakolostomicheskih gryzh. Hirurg. 2016; 10 (144): 24–30. Russian.
  11. Hansson BM, Slater NJ, Schouten van der Velden AP, et al. Surgical techniques for parastomal hernia repair: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Surg. 2012; 255: 685–95.
  12. Tadeo-Ruiz G, Picazo-Yeste JS, Moreno-Sanz C, Herrero-Bogajo ML. Parastomal hernias: background, current status and future prospects. Cirugía Española (English Edition). 2010; 87 (6): 339–49.
  13. Antoniou SA, Agresta F, Garcia Alamino JM, et al. European Hernia Society guidelines on prevention and treatment of parastomal hernias. Hernia. 2018; 22: 183–98.
  14. Gregg ZA, Dao HE, Schechter S, Shah N. Paracolostomal Hernia Repair: who and when? Journal of the American College of Surgeons. 2014: 1105–12.
  15. Szczepkowski M, Gil G, Kobus A. Parastomal hernia repair: Bielañski hospital experience. Acta chirurgica Iugoslavica. 2006; 53 (2): 99–102.
  16. Okorji LM, Kasten KR. Diagnosis and Management of Parastomal Hernias. Dis Colon Rectum. 2019 Feb; 62 (2): 158–62. DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001293.
  17. Rodoman GV, Malgina NV, Razbirin VN, Epifanova SV, Dolgina TYu, Kuznecov AI. Primenenie mul'tispiral'noj komp'juternoj tomografii dlja ocenki jeffektivnosti hirurgicheskogo lechenija pacientov s parakolostomicheskoj gryzhej. Hirurgija. Zhurnal im. N. I. Pirogova. 2021; (3): 36–41. Russian.
  18. Burov NE. Kratkij obzor istorii MNOAR. K 50-letiju MNOAR. Anesteziologija i reanimatologija. 2013; (4): 77–82. Russian.
  19. Lee TH, Marcantonio ER, Mangione CM, et al. Derivation and prospective validation of a simple index for prediction of cardiac risk of major noncardiac surgery. Circulation. 1999; 100 (10): 1043–9.
  20. Sugarbacker PH. Peritoneal approach to prosrhetic mesh repair of parastomy hernias. Ann Surg. 1985; 201: 344–6.
  21. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien P. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004; 240: 205–13.
  22. Rodoman GV, Malgina NV, Razbirin VN, Dolgina TYu. Vybor sinteticheskogo allotransplantata dlja operacij po povodu parakolostomicheskih gryzh. Hirurg. 2018; 9–10: 3–12. Russian.
  23. The EuroQol group. EuroQol — a new facility for the measurement of health related quality of life. Health Policy. December 1990; 16: 199–208. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/01688510(90)90421-9.
  24. Notes on the use of EQ-5D developed by the EuroQol Group, 2003, EuroQol Business Management, PO Box 4445 3006 AK Rotterdam, the Netherlands, Available from: www.euroqol org.
  25. Blackwell S, Pinkney T. Quality of life and parastomal hernia repair: the PROPHER study. Hernia. 2020; 24: 429–30.
  26. Gachabayov M, Orujova L, Latifi LA, Latifi R. Use of Biologic Mesh for the Treatment and Prevention of Parastomal Hernias. Surg Technol Int. 2020 Nov; 28; 37: 115–9.
  27. Cross AJ, Buchwald PL, Frizelle FA, Eglinton TW. Meta-analysis of prophylactic mesh to prevent parastomal hernia. Br J Surg. 2017 Feb; 104 (3): 179–186. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.10402. Epub 2016 Dec 22.
  28. Pich J. Prosthetic mesh for the prevention of parastomal hernias. Am J Nurs. 2019 Apr; 119 (4): 49. DOI: 10.1097/01. NAJ.0000554548.93403.64.