2024 / 06

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2024.061
Copyright: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee: Pirogov University.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effects of lytic bacteriophages of the families Herelleviridae and Rountreeviridae on the Staphylococcus aureus biofilms

Abdraimova NK, Shitikov EA, Malakhova MV, Gorodnichev RB, Kornienko MA
About authors

Lopukhin Federal Research and Clinical Center of Physical-Chemical Medicine of the Federal Medical Biological Agency, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Narina K. Abdraimova
Malaya Pirogovskaya, 1а, Moscow, 119435, Russia; moc.liamg@aniranavomiardba

About paper

Funding: the study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 22-15-00443, https://rscf.ru/project/22-15-00443/

Author contribution: Abdraimova NK — study plan, data acquisition and processing, manuscript writing; Shitikov EA, Kornienko MA — study plan, data processing, manuscript writing; Malakhova MV — data acquisition and processing; Gorodnichev RB — study plan, data acquisition and processing.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was compliant with the guidelines SP 1.3.2322-08 "Safety of Working with Microorganisms of III—IV Groups of Pathogenicity (Danger) and Causative Agents of Parasitic Diseases"; guidelines SP 1.3.2518-09 “Additions and Amendments No. 1 to the guidelines SP 1.3.2322-08 "Safety of Working With Microorganisms of III—IV Groups of Pathogenicity (Danger) and Causative Agents of Parasitic Diseases"; guidelines "Sanitary and Epidemiologic Requirements for the Handling of Medical Waste" (SanPiN 2.1.7.2790-10), as well as Federal Clinical Guidelines "Rational Use of Bacteriophages in Clinical and Epidemiological Practice".

Received: 2024-11-14 Accepted: 2024-11-30 Published online: 2024-12-24
|
  1. Ikuta KS, Swetschinski LR, Robles Aguilar G, Sharara F, Mestrovic T, et al. Global Mortality Associated with 33 Bacterial Pathogens in 2019: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. The Lancet. 2022; 400: 2221–48.
  2. Idrees M, Sawant S, Karodia N, Rahman A. Staphylococcus Aureus Biofilm: Morphology, Genetics, Pathogenesis and Treatment Strategies. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021; 18: 7602.
  3. Tuon FF, Suss PH, Telles JP, Dantas LR, Borges NH, Ribeiro VST. Antimicrobial Treatment of Staphylococcus Aureus Biofilms. Antibiotics. 2023; 12: 87.
  4. Liu K, Wang C, Zhou X, Guo X, Yang Y, Liu W, et al. Bacteriophage Therapy for Drug-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Infections. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2024; 14.
  5. Plumet L, Ahmad-Mansour N, Dunyach-Remy C, Kissa K, Sotto A, Lavigne J-P, et al. Bacteriophage Therapy for Staphylococcus Aureus Infections: A Review of Animal Models, Treatments, and Clinical Trials. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022; 12: 907314.
  6. Gordina E, Bozhkova S, Smirnova LN. Effects of Bacteriophages on Biofilms Formed by Staphylococcus Aureus Isolated from Patients with Orthopedic Infection. Clinical Microbiology and Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. 2022; 24: 283–8.
  7. Totten KMC, Patel R. Phage Activity against Planktonic and Biofilm Staphylococcus Aureus Periprosthetic Joint Infection Isolates. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy. 2022; 66: e01879.
  8. Hosseinidoust Z, Tufenkji N, van de Ven TGM. Formation of Biofilms under Phage Predation: Considerations Concerning a Biofilm Increase. Biofouling. 2013; 29: 457–68.
  9. Fernández L, González S, Campelo AB, Martínez B, Rodríguez A, García P. Low-Level Predation by Lytic Phage phiIPLA-RODI Promotes Biofilm Formation and Triggers the Stringent Response in Staphylococcus Aureus. Scientific Reports. 2017; 7: 40965.
  10. Eucast: EUCAST Available from: https://www.eucast.org/ (accessed on 13 November 2024).
  11. Kornienko M, Kuptsov N, Gorodnichev R, Bespiatykh D, Guliaev A, Letarova M, et al. Contribution of Podoviridae and Myoviridae Bacteriophages to the Effectiveness of Anti-Staphylococcal Therapeutic Cocktails. Sci Rep. 2020; 10: 18612.
  12. Enright MC, Day NP, Davies CE, Peacock SJ, Spratt BG. Multilocus sequence typing for characterization of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-susceptible clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Clin Microbiol. 2000; 38 (3): 1008–15.
  13. Ghasemian A, Peerayeh SN, Bakhshi B, Mirzaee M. High Prevalence of Icaadbc Genes Responsible for Biofilm Formation in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus Aureus From Hospitalized Children. Archives of Pediatric Infectious Diseases. 2015; 3.
  14. Cassat JE, Lee CY, Smeltzer MS. Investigation of Biofilm Formation in Clinical Isolates of Staphylococcus Aureus. Methods Mol Biol. 2007; 391: 127–44.
  15. Stepanović S, Vuković D, Hola V, Di Bonaventura G, Djukić S, Cirković I, et al. Quantification of Biofilm in Microtiter Plates: Overview of Testing Conditions and Practical Recommendations for Assessment of Biofilm Production by Staphylococci. APMIS. 2007; 115: 891–9.
  16. Mazzocco A, Waddell TE, Lingohr E, Johnson RP. Enumeration of Bacteriophages Using the Small Drop Plaque Assay System. Methods Mol Biol. 2009; 501: 81–85.
  17. Gostev V, Kruglov A, Kalinogorskaya O, Dmitrenko O, Khokhlova O, Yamamoto T, et al. Molecular Epidemiology and Antibiotic Resistance of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Circulating in the Russian Federation. Infection, Genetics and Evolution. 2017; 53: 189–94.
  18. Wang X, Zhao H, Wang B, Zhou Y, Xu Y, Rao L, et al. Identification of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ST8 Isolates in China with Potential High Virulence. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2022; 11: 507–18.
  19. Strauß L, Stegger M, Akpaka PE, Alabi A, Breurec S, Coombs G, et al. Origin, Evolution, and Global Transmission of Community-Acquired Staphylococcus Aureus ST8. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017; 114: E10596–E10604.
  20. Xu K, Wang Y, Jian Y, Chen T, Liu Q, Wang H, et al. Staphylococcus Aureus ST1 Promotes Persistent Urinary Tract Infection by Highly Expressing the Urease. Front Microbiol. 2023; 14: 1101754.
  21. Smith JT. Eckhardt EM, Hansel NB, Rahmani Eliato T, Martin IW, Andam CP. Genome Evolution of Invasive Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus in the Americas. Microbiol Spectr. 2022; 10: e0020122.
  22. Kurt K, Rasigade J-P, Laurent F, Goering RV, Žemličková H, Machova I, et al. Subpopulations of Staphylococcus Aureus Clonal Complex 121 Are Associated with Distinct Clinical Entities. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e58155.
  23. Cramton SE, Gerke C, Schnell NF, Nichols WW, Götz F. The Intercellular Adhesion (Ica) Locus Is Present in Staphylococcus Aureus and Is Required for Biofilm Formation. Infect Immun. 1999; 67: 5427–33.
  24. Peng Q, Tang X, Dong W, Sun N, Yuan W. A Review of Biofilm Formation of Staphylococcus aureus and Its Regulation Mechanism. Antibiotics (Basel). 2022; 12 (1): 12.
  25. Moller AG. Winston K, Ji S, Wang J, Davis MNH, Solís-Lemus CR, et al. Genes Influencing Phage Host Range in Staphylococcus Aureus on a Species-Wide Scale. mSphere. 2021; (6): e01263.
  26. Göller PC. Elsener T, Lorgé D, Radulovic N, Bernardi V, Naumann A, et al. Multi-Species Host Range of Staphylococcal Phages Isolated from Wastewater. Nat Commun. 2021; 12: 6965.
  27. Schwartz K, Ganesan M, Payne DE, Solomon MJ, Boles BR. Extracellular DNA facilitates the formation of functional amyloids in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. Molecular microbiology. 2016; 99 (1): 123–34.
  28. Duarte AC, Fernández L, Jurado A, Campelo AB, Shen Y, Rodríguez A, et al. Synergistic Removal of Staphylococcus Aureus Biofilms by Using a Combination of Phage Kayvirus Rodi with the Exopolysaccharide Depolymerase Dpo7. Front Microbiol. 2024; 15: 1438022.