ORIGINAL RESEARCH

MFTS and AQSA scales validation in patients with multiple and concomitant foot fractures

About authors

Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Field Surgery, Faculty of Pediatrics,
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow

Correspondence should be addressed: Maksim Korolev
Leninskiy prospect, d. 10, korp. 7, Moscow, Russia, 117049; ur.liam@ffelorokrotcod

Received: 2016-03-30 Accepted: 2016-04-07 Published online: 2017-01-05
|
Fig. 1. Questionnaire for assessing the effectiveness of treatment of foot fractures using the Moscow Foot Trauma Scale (MFTS)
Fig. 2. The questionnaire for assessing the effectiveness of treatment of foot fractures using the Abbreviated Questionnaire of Subjective Assessment (AQSA)
Table 1. Treatment effectiveness assessment (12 months) using the SF-36, AOFAS, MFTS and AQSA scales
Note. PCS — Physical Component Summary of the SF-36 scale, MCS — Mental Component Summary of the SF-36 scale. The results are presented as arithmetic mean.
Table 2. Clinical and metric properties of the SF-36, AOFAS, MFTS and AQSA scales
Note. PCS — Physical Component Summary of the SF-36 scale, MCS — Mental Component Summary of the SF-36 scale.
Table 3. Convergent validity values for the SF-36, AOFAS, MFTS and AQSA scales
Note. PCS — Physical Component Summary of the SF-36 scale, MCS – Mental Component Summary of the SF-36 scale; R — group of patients with retrospective observation, P — group of patients with prospective observation; p ≤0.05.