2016 / 02

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2016-02-09

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

MFTS and AQSA scales validation in patients with multiple and concomitant foot fractures

Korolev MA, Yarmak DO, Miroschnikova EA, Korobushkin GV
About authors

Department of Traumatology, Orthopedics and Field Surgery, Faculty of Pediatrics,
Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow

Correspondence should be addressed: Maksim Korolev
Leninskiy prospect, d. 10, korp. 7, Moscow, Russia, 117049; ur.liam@ffelorokrotcod

Received: 2016-03-30 Accepted: 2016-04-07 Published online: 2017-01-05
|
  1. Viskarra ME, Zimina EV, Gurina SA, Yarygin NV. Validizatsiya shkal i voprosnikov dlya otsenki funktsional'nogo sostoyaniya i kachestva zhizni patsientov s perelomovyvikhami golenostopnogo sustava. Rossiyskie meditsinskie vesti. 2011; 16 (2): 61–71. Russian.
  2. Novik AA, Ionova TI. Rukovodstvo po issledovaniyu kachestva zhizni v meditsine. Moscow: Izd-vo “OLMA Media Grupp”; 2007. 313 p. Russian.
  3. Knop C, Oeser M, Bastian L. [Development and validation of the visual analogue scale (VAS) spine score].  Unfallchirurg. 2001; 104 (6): 488–97. German.
  4. Evsina OV. [The quality of life in medicine — an important andicator pf patient health status (review)]. Lichnost' v menjajushhemsja mire: zdorov'e, adaptacija, razvitie. 2013; (1): 119–33. Russian.
  5. Viskarra ME, Yarygin NV, Zimina EV. Analiz faktorov, vliyayushchikh na kachestvo zhizni i funktsional'noe sostoyanie patsientov s perelomovyvikhami golenostopnogo sustava. Problemy standartizatsii v zdravookhranenii. 2011; (3-4): 9–15. Russian.
  6. Viskarra ME. Izuchenie kachestva zhizni i funktsional'nogo sostoyaniya patsientov s perelomovyvikhami golenostopnogo sustava s pomoshch'yu shkal i oprosnikov [dissertation]. Moscow: M. I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry; 2011. Russian.
  7. Glantz S. Mediko-biologicheskaya statistika. Мoscow: Izd-vo “Praktika”; 1998. 459 c. Russian.
  8. Golovin SYu. Slovar' prakticheskogo psihologa. Minsk: Izd-vo “Kharvest”; 1998. 800 p. Russian.
  9. Amirdzhanova VN, Goryachev DV, Korshunov NI, Rebrov AP, Sorotskaya VN. [SF-36 questionnaire population quality of life indices]. Nauchno-prakticheskaya revmatologiya. 2008; (1): 36–48. Russian.
  10. Jenkinson C, Coulter A, Wright L. Short form 36 (SF-36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age. BMJ. 1993; 306 (6890): 1437–40.
  11. Kitaoka HB, Alexander U, Adelaar RS, et al. Clinical rating systems for the ankle hindfoot, midfoot, hallux and lesser toes. Foot Ankle Int.1994. 15: 349–53.
  12. SooHoo NF, Shuler M, Fleming LL; American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society. Evaluation of the validity of the AOFAS Clinical Rating Systems by correlation to the SF-36. Foot Ankle Int. 2003 Jan; 24 (1): 50–5.
  13. Ware JE, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992 Jun; 30 (6): 473–83.
  14. Schuh A, Hausel M. [Difficlties in evaluating follow-up outcome in calcaneus fracture managed with plate osteosinthesis. Is there a reliable score?] Unfallchirurg. 2000; 103 (4): 295–300. German.
  15. 15.Gurevich KM, Borisova EM. Psihologicheskaja diagnostika. Moscow: Izd-vo “URAO”; 1997. 304 p. Russian.
  16. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951; 16: 297–334.
  17. Kline P. A handbook of test construction (psychology revivals): introduction to psychometric design. Abingdon, UK: Routledge; 2015. 274 p.
  18. Schmitt N. Uses and abuses of coefficient alpha. Psychological Assessment. 1996; 8 (4): 350–3.