OPINION

Methods of genetic toxicology in the assessment of genomic damage induced by electromagnetic ionizing radiation

Ryzhkin SA1,2,3, Margulis AB2, Kurinenko BM2
About authors

1 Kazan State Medical Academy (branch of the Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education), Kazan, Russia

2 Кazan (Volga Region) Federal University, Kazan, Russia

3 Kazan State Medical University, Kazan

Correspondence should be addressed: Sergey Ryzhkin
ul. Butlerova, d. 36, Kazan, Russia, 420012; ur.xobni@777asr

About paper

Funding: this work was supported by the Russian Foundation for Basic Research and the Government of the Republic of Tatarstan (Project No. 16-16-16018).

All authors' contribution to this work is equal: selection and analysis of literature, planning of the manuscript's structure, data interpretation, drafting of the manuscript, editing.

Received: 2017-04-10 Accepted: 2017-05-25 Published online: 2017-07-20
|
  1. Mortelmans K, Zeiger E. The Ames Salmonella microsome mutagenicity assay. Mutat Res. 2010 Nov 20; 455 (1–2): 29–60.
  2. Margulis AB, Ryzhkin SA, Slesareva AN, Belonogova NV, Ponomarev VYa, Ilinskaya ON. Genotoksicheskiye effekty oblucheniya na rentgeno-komp'yuternykh tomografakh. Vestnik Kazanskogo tekhnologicheskogo universiteta. 2014; 17 (14): 380–2. Russian.
  3. Ryzhkin SA, Margulis AB, Belonogova NV, Ilinskaya ON. Comparative study of the X-ray diagnostic procedures safety using bacterial test-systems. In: Badalyan H, editor. Proceedings of International workshop ‘Ionizing and non-ionizing radiation influence on structure and biophysical properties of living cells’; 2015 Sep 25–27; Tsakhkadzor, Armenia. Armenian Journal of Physics. 2016; 9 (1).
  4. Adler ID. Cytogenetic tests in mammals. In: Venitt S, Parry JM, editors. Mutagenicity testing: practical approach. Oxford: IRL Press; 1984. p. 275–306.
  5. PetrashovaDA,PozharskayaVV,BelishevaNK.Genotoksicheskiye effekty prirodnykh istochnikov ioniziruyushchey radiatsii v limfotsitakh perifericheskoy krovi i bukkal'nom epitelii gornykh rabochikh. In: VII s’yezd po radiatsionnym issledovaniyam (radiobiologiya, radioekologiya, radiatsionnaya bezopasnost'); 2014 Oct 21–24; Moscow, Russia. Moscow: Izd-vo RUDN; 2014. p. 84. Russian.
  6. Bonassi S, Kirsh-Volders M, Stromberg U, Vermuelen R, Tucker JD. Human population studies with cytigenetic biomarkers; review of literature and future prospectives. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2005 Mar–Apr; 45 (2–3): 258–70. DOI: 10.1002/em.20115.
  7. Stavitskiy RV, editor. Meditsinskaya rentgenologiya: tekhnicheskiye aspekty, klinicheskiye materialy, radiatsionnaya bezopasnost'. Moscow: MNPI; 2003. 344 p. Russian.
  8. Burlakova EB. Effekt sverkhmalykh doz. Vestnik RAN. 1994; 64 (5): 425. Russian.
  9. Mothersill C, Seymour CB. Radiation-induced bystander effects - implications for cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2004 Feb; 4 (2): 158–64. DOI: 10.1038/nrc1277.
  10. Domina EA. Meditsinskiye rentgenologicheskiye issledovaniya i kantserogennyye effekty. Problemi radíatsíynoí meditsini ta radíobíologíí (Problems of radiation medicine and radiobiology). 2014; 19: 35-47. Ukrainian.
  11. Domina EA. The radiobiological aspects of screening mammography: a reminder about possible distant negative effects. In: Mezhdunarodnaya konferentsiya ‘Radiobiologicheskie i radioekologicheskie aspekty Chernobyl'skoy katastrofy’; 2011 Apr 11–15; Slavutich, Ukrain. Slavutich: Fіtosotsіotsentr; 2011. p. 28.
  12. 1. Khvostunov IK, Shepel NN, Sevankayev AV, Nugis VYu, Korovchuk ON, Kursova LV et al. Sovershenstvovaniye metodov biologicheskoy dozimetrii putem analiza khromosomnykh ab-beratsiy v limfotsitakh krovi cheloveka pri obluchenii in vitro i in vivo. Mediko-biologicheskiye problemy zhiznedeyatel'nosti. 2013; 1 (9): 135–47. Russian.
  13. Snigiryova GP. [Biological dosimetry on the strength of cytogenetic analysis]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo nauchnogo tsentra rentgenoradiologii. 2011; (11) [Internet]. [cited 2017 Apr] Available from: http://vestnik.rncrr.ru/vestnik/v11/papers/snigir2_v11.htm. Russian.
  14. Kolyubayeva SN. Ispol'zovaniye tsitogeneticheskikh metodov v radiatsionnoy meditsine. Vestnik Rossiyskoy Voyenno- meditsinskoy Akademii. 2008; 3 (23 Suppl 1): 179. Russian.
  15. Mozerova EYa. [New sources of low doses of radiation: results of development of diagnostic and therapeutic radiology]. Radiation Hygiene. 2012; 5 (2): 71–4. Russian.
  16. Ryzhkin SA, Ivanov SI, Patyashina MA, Ismagilov RK, Akopova NA, Loginova SV et al. [Modern peculiarities of the medical exposure levels forming of the tatarstan republic population during x-ray procedures implementation]. Radiation Hygiene. 2015; 8 (1): 45–54. Russian.
  17. Ryzhkin SA, Sharafutdinov BM, Mikhaylov MK. [Experience with different single-stage selective arterial catheterization procedures during x-ray endovascular interventions to reduce a radiation dose for patients]. Vestnik rentgenologii i radiologii. 2017; 98 (1): 30–5. Russian.
  18. Valentin D, editor. Radiatsionnaya zaschita v meditsine. Saint- Peterburg: NII radiatsionnoy gigieny im. prof. P. V. Ramzaeva; 2011. 66 p. Available from: http://www.icrp.org/docs/P105Russian.pdf. Russian.
  19. Vasilyev SA, Stepanova EYu, Kutenkov OP, Belenko AA, Zharkova LP, Bolshakov MA et al. Dvunitevyye razryvy DNK v limfotsitakh cheloveka posle odnokrat-nogo vozdeystviya impul'sno-periodicheskogo rentgenovskogo izlucheniya v malykh dozakh: nelineynaya dozovaya zavisimost'. Radiatsionnaya biologiya. Radioekologiya. 2012; 52 (1): 31–8. Russian.