Copyright: © 2018 by the authors. Licensee: Pirogov University.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).

CLINICAL CASE

Formation of arteriovenous fistula following surgical resection of vestibular schwannoma

Reutov AA1, Aronov MS2, Kushel YuV3
About authors

1 Clinical Hospital of the Department for Presidential Affairs of the Russian Federation, Moscow

2 Burnasyan Federal Medical Biophysical Center, Moscow, Russia

3 Burdenko National Medical Research Center of Neurosurgery, Moscow

Correspondence should be addressed: Andrey A. Reutov
Marshala Timoshenko 15, Moscow, 121359; ur.oruenretnec@votuer

Received: 2018-01-19 Accepted: 2018-02-20 Published online: 2018-08-15
|
  1. Nonaka Y, et al. Contemporary surgical management of vestibular schwannomas: analysis of complications and lessons learned over the past decade. Neurosurgery, 2013; 72 (2 Suppl Operative): 103–15; discussion ons115.
  2. Gal TJ, Shinn J, Huang B. Current epidemiology and management trends in acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2010; 142 (5): 677–81.
  3. Pogodzinski MS, Harner SG, Link MJ. Patient choice in treatment of vestibular schwannoma. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2004; 130 (5): 611–6.
  4. Arriaga MA, Lin J. Translabyrinthine approach: indications, techniques, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012; 45 (2): 399–415.
  5. Angeli S. Middle fossa approach: indications, technique, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012; 45 (2): 417–38.
  6. Elhammady MS, Telischi FF, Morcos JJ. Retrosigmoid approach: indications, techniques, and results. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2012; 45 (2): 375–97.
  7. Rabelo de Freitas M, et al. Analysis of hearing preservation and facial nerve function for patients undergoing vestibular schwannoma surgery: the middle cranial fossa approach versus the retrosigmoid approach–personal experience and literature review. Audiol Neurootol. 2012; 17 (2): 71–81.
  8. Sughrue ME, et al. Beyond audiofacial morbidity after vestibular schwannoma surgery. J Neurosurg. 2011; 114 (2): 367–74.
  9. Ebersold MJ, et al. Current results of the retrosigmoid approach to acoustic neurinoma. J Neurosurg. 1992; 76 (6): 901–9.
  10. McClelland S, 3rd, Guo H, Okuyemi KS. Morbidity and mortality following acoustic neuroma excision in the United States: analysis of racial disparities during a decade in the radiosurgery era. Neuro Oncol. 2011; 13 (11): 1252–9.
  11. Wiet RJ, et al. Complications in the approach to acoustic tumor surgery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1986; 95 (1 Pt 1): 28–31.
  12. Slattery WH, 3rd, Francis S, House KC, Perioperative morbidity of acoustic neuroma surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2001; 22 (6): 895–902.
  13. Selesnick SH, et al. The incidence of cerebrospinal fluid leak after vestibular schwannoma surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2004; 25 (3): 387–93.
  14. Sade B, Mohr G, Dufour JJ. Vascular complications of vestibular schwannoma surgery: a comparison of the suboccipital retrosigmoid and translabyrinthine approaches. J Neurosurg. 2006; 105 (2): 200–4.
  15. de los Reyes RA, et al. Direct repair of an extracranial vertebral artery pseudoaneurysm: case report and review of the literature. Neurosurgery. 1990; 26 (3): 528–33.
  16. Inamasu J, Guiot BH. Iatrogenic vertebral artery injury. Acta Neurol Scand. 2005; 112 (6): 349–57.
  17. George B, Bresson D, Bruneau M. Pathology and surgery around the vertebral artery. Springer-Verlag. Paris: 2011.
  18. Schroeder GD, Hsu WK, Vertebral artery injuries in cervical spine surgery. Surg Neurol Int. 2013; 4 (Suppl 5): 362–7.
  19. Li PM, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula following translabyrinthine resection of cerebellopontine angle tumors: report of two cases. Skull Base Rep. 2011; 1 (1): 51–8.
  20. Cohen SD, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistula: diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2009; 119 (2): 293–7.