2018 / 05

Следующая статья
DOI: 10.24075/vrgmu.2018.069

ОРИГИНАЛЬНОЕ ИССЛЕДОВАНИЕ

Инструментальная пальпация в эндоскопической хирургии почек: опыт применения

Р. Ф. Солодова1, М. П. Толстых2, Т. К. Исаев3, Р. Н. Трушкин3, В. И. Вторенко3, В. М. Староверов1, М. Э. Соколов1
Информация об авторах

1 Механико-математический факультет, Московский государственный университет имени М. В. Ломоносова, Москва

2 Московский государственный медико-стоматологический университет имени А. И. Евдокимова, Москва

3 Урологическое отделение, Городская клиническая больница № 52, Москва

Для корреспонденции: Розалия Фаилевна Солодова
Ленинские горы, д. 1, стр. 46, г. Москва, 119991; gro.vodolos@ayilazor

Информация о статье

Финансирование: работа выполнена при поддержке Российского научного фонда: проект № 16-11-00058 «Разработка методов и алгоритмов автоматизированного анализа медицинской тактильной информации и классификации тактильных образов».

Благодарности: авторы выражают благодарность А. В. Галатенко и В. В. Галатенко (МГУ имени М. В. Ломоносова) за замечания, ценные комментарии и помощь в подготовке текста.

Статья получена: 26.07.2018 Статья принята к печати: 23.11.2018 Опубликовано online: 16.12.2018
|
  1. Paszek MJ, Zahir N, Johnson KR, Lakins JN, Rozenberg GI, Gefen A, et al. Tensional homeostasis and the malignant phenotype. Cancer Cell. 2005; 8 (3): 241–54.
  2. Abdul-Muhsin HM, Humphreys MR. Advances in laparoscopic urologic surgery techniques. F1000Res. 2016; 5(F1000 Faculty Rev): 716.
  3. Okamura AM. Haptic feedback in robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery. Curr Opin Urol. 2009; 19 (1): 102–7.
  4. Lim SC, Lee HK, Park J. Role of combined tactile and kinesthetic feedback in minimally invasive surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2015; 11 (3): 360–374.
  5. Fletcher SW, O'Malley MS, Pilgrim CA, Gonzalez JJ. How do women compare with internal medicine residents in breast lump detection? A study with silicone models. J Gen Intern Med. 1989; 4 (4): 277-83.
  6. McDonald S, Saslow D, Alciati MH. Performance and reporting of clinical breast examination: A review of the literature. CA: A Cancer J Clin. 2004; 54 (6): 345–361.
  7. Lim SC, Lee HK, Park J. Role of combined tactile and kinesthetic feedback in minimally invasive surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2015; 11 (3): 360–374.
  8. Egorov V, Sarvazyan AP. Mechanical imaging of the breast. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008; 27 (9): 1275–87.
  9. Weiss RE, Egorov V, Ayrapetyan S, Sarvazyan N, Sarvazyan A. Prostate mechanical imaging: a new method for prostate assessment. Urology. 2008; 71 (3): 425A.9.
  10. Egorov V, van Raalte H, Lucente V. Quantifying vaginal tissue elasticity under normal and prolapse conditions by tactile imaging. Int Urogynecol J. 2012; 23 (4): 459–66.
  11. Afshari E, Najarian S, Simforoosh N. Application of artificial tactile sensing approach in kidney-stone-removal laparoscopy. Biomed Mater Eng. 2010; 20 (5): 261–7.
  12. Barmin V, Sadovnichy V, Sokolov M, Pikin O, Amiraliev A. An original device for intraoperative detection of small indeterminate nodules. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014; 46: 1027–1031.
  13. Solodova RF, Galatenko VV, Nakashidze ER, Shapovalyants SG, Andreytsev IL, Sokolov ME. et al. Instrumental mechanoreceptoric palpation in gastrointestinal surgery. Minimally invasive surgery. 2017; 2017.
  14. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ, Dierks SM, Merety K,S, Darcy MD, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol. 1991; 146 (2): 278–282.
  15. Wottawa CR, Genovese B, Nowroozi BN, Hart SD, Bisley JW, Grundfest WS, et al. Evaluating tactile feedback in robotic surgery for potential clinical application using an animal model. Surg Endosc. 2016; 30 (8): 3198–209.
  16. Puangmali P, Althoefer K, Seneviratne LD, Murphy D, Dasgupta P. State-of-the-art in force and tactile sensing for minimally invasive surgery. IEEE Sensors J. 2008; 8 (4): 371–381.
  17. Dahiya RS, Metta G, Valle M, Sandini G. Tactile sensing — From humans to humanoids. IEEE Trans Robot. 2010; 26 (1): 1–20.
  18. Schostek S, Schurr MO, Buess GF. Review on aspects of artificial tactile feedback in laparoscopic surgery. Med Eng Phys. 2009; 31 (8): 887–898.
  19. Schostek S, Zimmermann M, Schurr MO, Prosst RL. Design and Performance of a Low-Cost Telemetric Laparoscopic Tactile Grasper. Surg Innov. 2016; 23 (3): 291–7.
  20. Samani A, Zubovits J, Plewes D. Elastic moduli of normal and pathological human breast tissues: an inversion-technique- based investigation of 169 samples. Phys Med Biol. 2007; 52 (6): 1565–76.
  21. Hoyt K, Castaneda B, Zhang M, Nigwekar P, di Sant'agnese PA, Joseph JV, et al. Tissue elasticity properties as biomarkers for prostate cancer. Cancer Biomark. 2008; 4 (4-5): 213–25.
  22. Kawano S, Kojima M, Higuchi Y, Sugimoto M, Ikeda K, Sakuyama N, et al. Assessment of elasticity of colorectal cancer tissue, clinical utility, pathological and phenotypical relevance. Cancer Sci. 2015; 106 (9): 1232–9.
  23. Lee JW, Lorenzo EI, Ahn B, Oh CK, Kim HJ, Han WK, et al. Palpation device for the identification of kidney and bladder cancer: a pilot study. Yonsei Med J. 2011; 52 (5): 768–72.
  24. Solodova R, Staroverov V, Galatenko V, Galatenko A, Solodov E, Antonov A., et al. Automated detection of heterogeneity in medical tactile images. In: Westwood JD, Westwood SW, Fellander-Tsai L, Fidopiastis CM, Liu A, Senger S, et al, editors. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 22. Vol. 220 of Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. Amsterdam: IOS Press. 2016; 383–389.
  25. Solodova RF, Galatenko VV, Nakashidze ER, Andreytsev IL, Galatenko AV, Senchik DK, et al. Instrumental tactile diagnostics in robot-assisted surgery. Med Devices (Auckl). 2016; 9: 377–382.
  26. Evans A, Armstrong S, Whelehan P, Thomson K, Rauchhaus P, Purdie C, et al. Can shear-wave elastography predict response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with invasive breast cancer? Br J Cancer. 2013; 109 (11): 2798–802.
  27. Fenner J, Stacer AC, Winterroth F, Johnson TD, Luker KE, Luker GD. Macroscopic stiffness of breast tumors predicts metastasis. Sci Rep. 2014; 4: 5512.