2021 / 01

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2021.008

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Oculomotor response to images in primary school children with mild intellectual disability

Nikishina VB1, Prirodova OF1, Petrash EA1, Sevrukova IA2
About authors

1 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

2 Kursk State Medical University, Kursk, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Ekaterina A. Petrash
Ostrovityanova, 1, Moscow, 117997; ur.liam@hsartep

About paper

Author contribution: Nikishina VB and Prirodova OF proposed the concept, interpreted and summarized the obtained data; Petrash EA performed qualitative and quantitative analysis of the obtained data; interpreted and summarized the results; Sevrukova IA conducted the study and performed data acquisition

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Kursk Medical State University (Protocol № 9 dated December 10, 2019). Written informed consent was obtained from the children’s parents or legal representatives.

Received: 2021-01-21 Accepted: 2021-02-15 Published online: 2021-02-26
|
  1. Zdravoohranenie v Rossii. 2019: Stat. sb. / Rosstat. M., 2019; 170 s. Russian.
  2. Petrova VG. Psihologija umstvenno otstalyh shkol'nikov. M.: Akademija, 2002; 160 s. Russian.
  3. Luriya AR. Osnovy nejropsihologii. M.: Akademija, 2003; 384 s. Russian.
  4. Berezhnaja SA. Osobennosti razvitija zritel'nogo vosprijatija u mladshih shkol'nikov s narusheniem intellektual'nogo razvitija. V sbornike: Materialy nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii; Simferopol, 16 maja 2017 g. Simferopol:  Arial, 2017; s. 32–34. Russian.
  5. Evlahova ZA. Osobennosti vosprijatija sjuzhetno-hudozhestvennyh kartin uchashhimisja vspomogatel'noj shkoly. Uchebnovospitatel'naja rabota v spec. shkolah. M., 1987; 205 s. Russian.
  6. Zabramnaja SD. Nekotorye psihologo-pedagogicheskie poazateli razgranichenija stepenej umstvennoj otstalosti u detej na nachal'nom jetape shkol'nogo obuchenija. Korrekcionnaja pedagogika. 2008; 1: 5–13. Russian.
  7. Isaev DN. Umstvennaja otstalost' u detej i podrostkov. SPb.: Rech', 2007; 389 s. Russian.
  8. Petrova VG. Psihologija umstvenno otstalyh shkol'nikov. M.: Akademija, 2002; 160 s. Russian.
  9. Rubinshtejn SYa. Psihologija umstvenno otstalogo shkol'nika. M.: Prosveshhenie, 1986; 192 s. Russian.
  10. Solovev IM. Osobennosti poznavatel'noj dejatel'nosti uchashhihsja vspomogatel'noj shkoly. M., 2004; 378 s. Russian.
  11. Tiadi A, Gérard C-L, Peyre H., Bui-Quoc E, et al. Immaturity of Visual Fixations in Dyslexic Children. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2016; 10: 574–84.
  12. Wang S, Jiang M, Duchesne XM, Laugeson EA, et al. Atypical Visual Saliency in Autism Spectrum Disorder Quantified through Model-Based Eye Tracking. Neuron. 2015; 88 (3): 604–16.
  13. Boot FH, Pel JJ, Evenhuis HM, et al. Delayed visual orienting responses in children with developmental and/or intellectual disabilities. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research. 2012; 47: 57–58
  14. Oganov SR. Nekotorye osobennosti razvitija chitatel'skoj dejatel'nosti u detej s disleksiej 9–13 let. V sbornike: Tezisy dokladov Vserossijskoj nauchno-prakticheskoj konferencii molodyh uchenyh s mezhdunarodnym uchastiem «Fundamental'nye issledovanija v pediatrii; Sankt-Peterburg, 31 oktjabrja 2019; SPb., 2019; s. 42–43. Russian.
  15. Dinevich KV, Dunaevskaja YeB. Issledovanie zritel'nogo vosprijatija tekstov raznogo vizual'nogo formata u detej s umstvennoj otstalost'ju. Kompleksnye issledovanija detstva. 2019; 2: 114– 120. Russian.