ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty

Minasov BSh, Yakupov RR, Bilyalov AR, Minasov TB, Valeev MM, Mavlyutov TR, Nigamedzanov IE, Akbashev VN, Karimov KK
About authors

Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Vladislav N. Akbashev
Lenina, 3, 45008, Ufa, Russia; ur.liam@bka-dalV

About paper

Funding: the study was supported by grant of the Government of the Republic of Bashkortostan for state support of scientific research guided by the leading scientists within the framework of the Eurasian Research and Educational Center programs; it was also supported by the Strategic Academic Leadership Program of the Bashkir State Medical University (PRIORITY-2030).

Author contribution: Minasov BSh, Yakupov RR, Bilyalov AR — developing the study design, data analysis; Minasov TB, Valeev MM, Mavlyutov TR — intraoperative control of determining the size of the endoprosthesis components, data acquisition, data analysis; Nigamedzanov IE, Akbashev VN, Karimov KK — statistical analysis, data estimation, literature review, computer, volumetric modeling, 3D printing of pelvic bones, acetabular and femoral components of the endoprosthesis.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Bashkir State Medical University (protocol № 11 dated 15 November 2023)

Received: 2023-11-12 Accepted: 2023-12-19 Published online: 2023-12-31
|

Preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty provides surgeons with a unique opportunity of thorough investigation of the patient’s anatomy, allows them to determine optimal implant size and position, as well as to prevent potential complication. Advances in digital technology enable expansion of opportunities of preoperative planning due to using three-dimensional modeling. The study was aimed to compare precision of the three-step preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty and the standard method. Methods: The study involved 224 patients with various forms of degenerative and dystrophic diseases of the hip joint, who were divided into the index and control groups based on the planning method. In the index group, preoperative planning of arthroplasty was conducted in three steps: assessment of bone density in the zones of fixation based on CT; virtual design involving the use of automated programs; 3D model construction based on the computer model. X-ray images and endoprosthesis templates were used in the comparison group. The results showed that there were no significant differences between planning methods in patients with osteoarthrosis and avascular necrosis of the femoral head (p > 0.05), in contrast to the group with traumatic hip joint pathology showing significant differences (рс = 0.002). Conclusions: the three-step algorithm for preoperative planning of hip arthroplasty showed higher efficacy in patients with various nosological forms of degenerative and dystrophic diseases of the hip joint compared to the standard method.

Keywords: hip replacement, arthroplasty, preoperative planning, volumetric modeling, 3D printing

КОММЕНТАРИИ (0)