ISSN Print 2500–1094
ISSN Online 2542–1204
BIOMEDICAL JOURNAL OF PIROGOV UNIVERSITY (MOSCOW, RUSSIA)
Copyright: © 2024 by the authors. Licensee: Pirogov University.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Morphofunctional state of cryopreserved blood cells at moderate low temperature
About authors
1 North Caucasus Federal University, Stavropol, Russia
2 Stavropol State Medical University, Stavropol, Russia
Correspondence should be addressed: Alexander A. Vlasov
Pushkina, 1, Stavropol, 355017, Russia; ur.ufcn@vosalva
About paper
Author contribution: Vlasov АА — study concept, procedure, interpretation of the results; Andrusenko SF — study design, literature review, manuscript writing; Denisova EV, Kadanova AA, Sokulskaya NN — data acquisition; Elkanova AB, Melchenko ЕА — data processing; Domenyuk DA — manuscript editing.
Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the North Caucasus Federal University (protocol No. 002 dated 11 July 2024); all subjects submitted the informed concent to participation in the study.
Received: 2024-07-17
Accepted: 2024-08-25
Published online: 2024-09-17
|
Table 1. White blood cell indicators of CBC in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)
Table 2. Differences in the computerized cytomorphometry data in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)
Table 3. Red blood cell indicators of CBC in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)
Table 4. Differences in the erythrocyte computerized cytomorphometry data in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)
Table 5. Platelet indicators of CBC in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)
Table 6. Platelet computerized cytomorphometry indicators in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)
