ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Morphofunctional state of cryopreserved blood cells at moderate low temperature

Vlasov AA1, Andrusenko SF1, Denisova EV1, Elkanova AB1, Kadanova AA1, Melchenko EA1, Sokulskaya NN1, Domenyuk DA2
About authors

1 North Caucasus Federal University, Stavropol, Russia

2 Stavropol State Medical University, Stavropol, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Alexander A. Vlasov
Pushkina, 1, Stavropol, 355017, Russia; ur.ufcn@vosalva

About paper

Author contribution: Vlasov АА — study concept, procedure, interpretation of the results; Andrusenko SF — study design, literature review, manuscript writing; Denisova EV, Kadanova AA, Sokulskaya NN — data acquisition; Elkanova AB, Melchenko ЕА — data processing; Domenyuk DA — manuscript editing.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the North Caucasus Federal University (protocol No. 002 dated 11 July 2024); all subjects submitted the informed concent to participation in the study.

Received: 2024-07-17 Accepted: 2024-08-25 Published online: 2024-09-17
|
Table 1. White blood cell indicators of CBC in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)
Table 2. Differences in the computerized cytomorphometry data in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)
Table 3. Red blood cell indicators of CBC in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)
Table 4. Differences in the erythrocyte computerized cytomorphometry data in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)
Table 5. Platelet indicators of CBC in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)
Table 6. Platelet computerized cytomorphometry indicators in the studied groups (Х ± м; р)
Note: * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 1 (р < 0.01); * * — a significant difference between the control group and the experimental group 2 (р < 0.01)