This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Determining targets for personalized multitarget noninvasive stimulation of the frontoparietal control network
Russian Сenter of Neurology and Neurosciences, Moscow, Russia
Correspondence should be addressed: Alexandra G. Poydasheva
Volokolamskoye shosse, 80, Moscow, 125310, Russia; ur.ygoloruen@avehsadyop
Funding: the study was conducted as part of the project “Developing a Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Method to Improve Cognitive Functions in Healthy Individuals” implemented within the framework of the National Project “New Health Preservation Technologies” (registration number 1025020400006-8-3.2.25).
Author contribution: Poydasheva AG, Sinitsyn DO, Bakulin IS — study planning and design; Poydasheva AG, Zabirova AH — literature review; Bakulin IS, Zabirova AH, Lagoda DYu — data acquisition; Sinitsyn DO, Poydasheva AG — data analysis; Poydasheva AG, Sinitsyn DO — manuscript writing; all authors — data interpretation, manuscript editing.
Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Russian Сenter of Neurology and Neurosciences (protocol No. 5-1/25 dated 19 May 2025). All the volunteers signed the informed consent form.
- Chen M, Zhao G, Peng L. Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Applications in the Study of Executive Functions: A Review. Brain Behav. 2024; 14 (11): e70099.
- Sun W, Wu Q, Gao L, Zheng Z, Xiang H, Yang K, et al. Advancements in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Research and the Path to Precision. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023; 19: 1841–51.
- Tik M, Hoffmann A, Sladky R, Tomova L, Hummer A, Navarro de Lara L, et al. Towards understanding rTMS mechanism of action: Stimulation of the DLPFC causes network-specific increase in functional connectivity. Neuroimage. 2017; 162: 289–96.
- Ørbo MC, Høier S, Vangberg TR, Csifcsak G, Grønli OK, Aslaksen PM. The cerebral and cognitive changes after intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) treatment for depression: study protocol for a randomized double-blind sham-controlled trial. Trials. 2024; 25 (1): 752.
- Smith S, Duff E, Groves A, Nichols TE, Jbabdi S, Westlye LT, et al. Structural Variability in the Human Brain Reflects Fine-Grained Functional Architecture at the Population Level. J Neurosci.; 39 (31): 6136–49.
- Lioumis P, Roine T, Granö I, Aydogan DB, Ukharova E, Souza VH, et al. Optimization of TMS target engagement: current state and future perspectives. Front Neurosci. 2025; 19: 1517228.
- Caulfield KA, Fleischmann HH, Cox CE, Wolf JP, George MS, McTeague LM. Neuronavigation maximizes accuracy and precision in TMS positioning: Evidence from 11,230 distance, angle, and electric field modeling measurements. Brain Stimul. 2022; 15 (5): 1192–205.
- Cash RFH, Zalesky A. Personalized and Circuit-Based Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Evidence, Controversies, and Opportunities. Biol Psychiatry. 2024; 95 (6): 510–22.
- Wang D, Buckner RL, Fox MD, Holt DJ, Holmes AJ, Stoecklein S, et al. Parcellating cortical functional networks in individuals. Nat Neurosci. 2015; 18 (12): 1853–60.
- Gordon EM, Laumann TO, Gilmore AW, Newbold DJ, Greene DJ, Berg JJ, et al. Precision Functional Mapping of Individual Human Brains. Neuron. 2017; 95 (4): 791–807.e7.
- Kong R, Li J, Orban C, Sabuncu MR, Liu H, Schaefer A, et al. Spatial Topography of Individual-Specific Cortical Networks Predicts Human Cognition, Personality, and Emotion. Cereb Cortex. 2019; 29 (6): 2533–51.
- Ning L, Makris N, Camprodon JA, Rathi Y. Limits and reproducibility of resting-state functional MRI definition of DLPFC targets for neuromodulation. Brain Stimul. 2019; 12 (1): 129–38.
- Fox MD, Liu H, Pascual-Leone A. Identification of reproducible individualized targets for treatment of depression with TMS based on intrinsic connectivity. Neuroimage. 2013; 66: 151–60.
- Cash RFH, Cocchi L, Lv J, Wu Y, Fitzgerald PB, Zalesky A. Personalized connectivity-guided DLPFC-TMS for depression: Advancing computational feasibility, precision and reproducibility. Hum Brain Mapp. 2021; 42 (13): 4155–72.
- Menon V, D'Esposito M. The role of PFC networks in cognitive control and executive function. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2022; 47 (1): 90–103.
- Xia H, He Q, Chen A. Understanding cognitive control in aging: A brain network perspective. Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14: 1038756.
- Ebrahimzadeh E, Sadjadi SM, Asgarinejad M, Dehghani A, Rajabion L, Soltanian-Zadeh H. Neuroenhancement by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on DLPFC in healthy adults. Cogn Neurodyn. 2025; 19 (1): 34.
- Zhang Y, Dong K, Yang J, Guo Q, Zhao Y, Zhu X, et al. Comparative efficacy of rTMS on different targets in Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2025; 17: 1536573.
- Xu M, Nikolin S, Samaratunga N, Chow EJH, Loo CK, Martin DM. Cognitive Effects Following Offline High-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (HF-rTMS) in Healthy Populations: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Neuropsychol Rev. 2024; 34 (1): 250–76.
- Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, Sabuncu MR, Lashkari D, Hollinshead M, et al. The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol. 2011; 106 (3): 1125–65.
- Hammers A, Allom R, Koepp MJ, Free SL, Myers R, et al. Threedimensional maximum probability atlas of the human brain, with particular reference to the temporal lobe. Hum Brain Mapp. 2003;19(4):224-47.
- Mayka MA, Corcos DM, Leurgans SE, Vaillancourt DE. Three-dimensional locations and boundaries of motor and premotor cortices as defined by functional brain imaging: a meta-analysis. Neuroimage. 2006;31(4):1453-74.
- Van Essen DC, Smith SM, Barch DM, Behrens TE, Yacoub E, Ugurbil K; et al. The WU-Minn Human Connectome Project: an overview. Neuroimage. 2013; 80: 62–79.
- Drakaki M, Mathiesen C, Siebner HR, Madsen K, Thielscher A. Database of 25 validated coil models for electric field simulations for TMS. Brain Stimul. 2022; 15 (3): 697–706.
- Lynch CJ, Elbau IG, Ng TH, Wolk D, Zhu S, Ayaz A, et al. Automated optimization of TMS coil placement for personalized functional network engagement. Neuron. 2022; 110 (20): 3263–77.
- Sayalı С, Gogulski J, Granö I, Lioumis P, Barrett F. Test-retest reliability of TMS-evoked potentials over fMRI-based definitions of non-motor cortical targets. bioRxiv 2024.12.20.629675.
- Pascual-Leone A, Rubio B, Pallardó F, Catalá MD. Rapid-rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in drug-resistant depression. Lancet. 1996; 348 (9022): 233–7.
- Tsukuda B, Ikeda S, Minami S, Katsura K, Shimizu T, Kame T, et al. Targeting Method for rTMS for Treating Depression in Japanese Patients: A Comparison of the Standard, F3, and Neuronavigation Approaches. Neuropsychobiology. 2024; 83 (3–4): 170–8.
- Fitzgerald PB. Targeting repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in depression: do we really know what we are stimulating and how best to do it? Brain Stimul. 2021; 14 (3): 730–6.
- Ahdab R, Ayache SS, Brugières P, Goujon C, Lefaucheur JP. Comparison of "standard" and "navigated" procedures of TMS coil positioning over motor, premotor and prefrontal targets in patients with chronic pain and depression. Neurophysiol Clin. 2010; 40 (1): 27–36.
- Bagattini C, Brignani D, Bonnì S, Quattrini G, Gasparotti R, Pievani M. Functional Imaging to Guide Network-Based TMS Treatments: Toward a Tailored Medicine Approach in Alzheimer’s Disease. Front Neurosci. 2021; 15: 687493.
- Castrillon G, Sollmann N, Kurcyus K, Razi A, Krieg SM, Riedl V. The physiological effects of noninvasive brain stimulation fundamentally differ across the human cortex. Sci Adv. 2020; 6 (5): eaay2739.