2025 / 06

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2025.068
Copyright: © 2025 by the authors. Licensee: Pirogov University.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Development and assessment of the bone allograft-based material for DLP 3D printing

Bilyalov AR , Chugunov SS , Akhatov ISh , Tikhonov AA , Shangina OR , Pavlov VN , Danilko KV , Galautdinov MF , Akbashev VN
About authors

Bashkir State Medical University, Ufa, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Azat R. Bilyalov
Lenina, 3, Ufa, 450008, Russia; moc.liamg@volaylib.taza

About paper

Funding: the study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation grant No. 23-15-20042.

Author contribution: Bilyalov AR, Chugunov SS — study planning, literature review, data interpretation, manuscript writing; Akhatov ISh — study planning, data interpretation, manuscript writing; Tikhonov AA — study planning, literature review, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; Shangina OR — study planning, data analysis and interpretation; Pavlov VN — study planning; Danilko KV — study planning, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; Galautdinov MF — data acquisition; Akbashev VN — literature review.

Received: 2025-11-03 Accepted: 2025-11-29 Published online: 2025-12-18
|
  1. GlobalData Plc, United States (US) Orthopedic Procedures Count By Segments And Forecast To 2030, GlobalData Plc, John Carpenter House, John Carpenter Street, London, EC4Y 0AN, UK, 2023. Available from: https://www.globaldata.com/store/report/usa-orthopedic-procedures-analysis/#:~:text=US%20Orthopedic%20Market%20Report%20Overview,US%20was%2018%2C577%2C953%20in%202022.
  2. Rogers GF, Greene AK, Autogenous bone graft: basic science and clinical implications, J Craniofac Surg. 2012; 23: 323–7. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318241dcba
  3. Dutta SR, Passi D, Singh P, Bhuibhar A, Ceramic and non-ceramic hydroxyapatite as a bone graft material: a brief review. Ir J Med Sci. 1971; 184 (2015): 101–06. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-014-1199-8.
  4. Yang C, Zhuo W, Li Q, Huang C, Yan H, Jin D, Preliminary outcomes of allograft and hydroxyapatite as substitutes for autograft in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with selflocking standalone cages. J Orthop Surg. 2021; 16: 123. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-021-02257-0.
  5. Rasch A, Naujokat H, Wang F, Seekamp A, Fuchs S, Klüter T, Evaluation of bone allograft processing methods: Impact on decellularization efficacy, biocompatibility and mesenchymal stem cell functionality. PLOS ONE. 2019; 14: e0218404. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218404.
  6. Buj-Corral I, Tejo-Otero A. 3D Printing of Bioinert Oxide Ceramics for Medical Applications. J Funct Biomater. 2022; 13 (3): 155. DOI: 10.3390/jfb13030155. PMID: 36135590; PMCID: PMC9505679. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb13030155.
  7. Thakur N, Carretta M, Komissarenko D, Blugan G. Advancements in DLP 3D printing: High strength alumina toughened zirconia ceramics for biomedical applications. Open Ceramics. 2024; 18: 100601. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oceram.2024.100601.
  8. Sadaf Bashir Khan, Syed Irfan, Zhengjun Zhang, Weifeng Yuan. ACS Applied Bio Materials. 2025; 8 (8): 6470–525. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1021/acsabm.4c01923.
  9. Muldashev ER, Muslimov SA, Vyalkov VA, Galimova VU, Nigmatullin RT, Salikhov AY, et al. Biomaterial alloplant dlja regenerativnoj hirurgii, RU2189257C1. 2002.
  10. American Society for Testing and Materials, ASTM C1424 -Standard Test MEthod for Monolithic Compressive Strength of Advanced Ceramics at Ambient Temperature. 2004.
  11. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10993-14:2001(E): Biological evaluation of medical devices — Part 14: Identification and quantification of degradation products from ceramics. 2001.
  12. Jacobs PF. Fundamentals of Stereolithography. 1992.
  13. Dey P. Bone Mineralisation. In: Churchill DG, Dutour Sikirić M, Čolović B, Füredi H. Milhofer, editors. Contemp Top Phosphorus Biol Mater. IntechOpen. 2020. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92065.
  14. Pietrzak WS, Woodell-May J, The Composition of Human Cortical Allograft Bone Derived from FDA/AATB-Screened Donors. J Craniofac Surg. 2005; 16: 579–85. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/01.SCS.0000159086.44801.C7.
  15. Wang W, Yeung KWK, Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review. Bioact Mater. 2017; 2: 224–47. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bioactmat.2017.05.007.
  16. Kuhn LT, Grynpas MD, Rey CC, Wu Y, Ackerman JL, Glimcher MJ. A Comparison of the Physical and Chemical Differences Between Cancellous and Cortical Bovine Bone Mineral at Two Ages. Calcif Tissue Int. 2008; 83: 146–54. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-008-9164-z.
  17. Ishikawa K, Ducheyne P, Radin S, Determination of the Ca/P ratio in calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite using X-ray diffraction analysis. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1993; 4: 165–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120386.
  18. Gotoh Y, Hiraiwa K, Nagayama M. In vitro mineralization of osteoblastic cells derived from human bone. Bone Miner. 1990; 8: 239–50. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-6009(90)90109-s.