2026 / 03

DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2026.029
Copyright: © 2026 by the authors. Licensee: Pirogov University.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Biocompatibility of microstructured polymer materials with potential use in reconstructive surgery

Gabriyanchik MA1 , Antonova OY2 , Taylakov ME2 , Grachev VA3 , Pirogov KS4 , Startseva OI1 , Kanev IL2
About authors

1 Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia

2 Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Pushchino, Russia

3 Moscow Polytechnic University, Moscow, Russia

4 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Igor L. Kanev
Institutskaya, 3, Pushchino, 142290, Russia; moc.liamg@venak4

About paper

Funding: the study was part of a research project sponsored by Neuroconduit LLC and financed under the state assignment No. FFRS-2024-0016 executed by Institute of Theoretical and Experimental Biophysics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Acknowledgements: the authors express their deep gratitude for the help of the staff of the Vivarium of Regenerative Medicine of the I. M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, JV Khristidis, BP Ershov, as well as the Laboratory of Digital Microscopic Analysis, AL Fayzulin. Ultrastructure of the materials was examined on equipment of the Research Equipment Sharing Center of Physical Methods for Studying Substances and Materials at the Kurnakov Institute of General and Inorganic Chemistry of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Author contribution: Gabriyanchik MA — research concept and design, editing; Antonova OY — design development, in vitro testing, data analysis, text preparation; Taylakov ME — production of materials, analysis and statistical data processing, editing; Grachev VA — production of materials, analysis and statistical data processing; Pirogov KS — text preparation; Startseva OI — concept and design of research, editing; Kanev IL — production concept and analysis of the structure of materials, data analysis, text preparation.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Minutes No. 10–25 of April 24, 2025), and conducted in compliance with the provisions of the European Convention for the Protection of Vertebrates used for Experimental and Other Scientific Purposes.

Received: 2026-04-14 Accepted: 2026-05-09 Published online: 2026-06-12
|
  1. Fornasari BE, Carta G, Gambarotta G, Raimondo S. Naturalbased biomaterials for peripheral nerve injury repair. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020; 8: 554257. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2020.554257.
  2. Zhang M, Li C, Zhou LP, Pi W, Zhang PX. Polymer scaffolds for biomedical applications in peripheral nerve reconstruction. Molecules. 2021; 26 (9): 2712. DOI: 10.3390/molecules26092712.
  3. Kaplan B, Levenberg S. The role of biomaterials in peripheral nerve and spinal cord injury: a review. Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23 (3): 1244. DOI: 10.3390/ijms23031244.
  4. Li R, Liu Z, Pan Y, Chen L, Zhang Z, Lu L. Peripheral nerve injuries treatment: a systematic review. Cell Biochem Biophys. 2014; 68 (3): 449–54. DOI: 10.1007/s12013-013-9742-1.
  5. Karumbaiah L. Neural tissue engineering. In: Neural Engineering. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2012. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-5227-0_19.
  6. Duraku LS, Eberlin KR, Moore A, et al. Ten myths in nerve surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12 (8): e6017. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000006017.
  7. Zhai X, Wang Y. Physical modulation and peripheral nerve regeneration: a literature review. Cell Regen. 2024; 13: 32. DOI: 10.1186/s13619-024-00215-9.
  8. Zheng F, Li R, He Q, et al. The electrostimulation and scar inhibition effect of chitosan/oxidized hydroxyethyl cellulose/ reduced graphene oxide/asiaticoside liposome based hydrogel on peripheral nerve regeneration in vitro. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl. 2020; 109: 110560. DOI: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.110560.
  9. Wan T, Li QC, Zhang FS, et al. Biomimetic ECM nerve guidance conduit with dynamic 3D interconnected porous network and sustained IGF-1 delivery for enhanced peripheral nerve regeneration and immune modulation. Mater Today Bio. 2024; 30: 101403. DOI: 10.1016/j.mtbio.2024.101403.
  10. Wan T, Wang YL, Zhang FS, et al. The porous structure of peripheral nerve guidance conduits: features, fabrication, and implications for peripheral nerve regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2023; 24 (18): 14132. DOI: 10.3390/ijms241814132.
  11. Woodruff MA, Hutmacher DW. The return of a forgotten polymer— Polycaprolactone in the 21st century. Prog Polym Sci. 2010; 35 (10): 1217–56. DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002.
  12. Panahi-Joo Y, Karkhaneh A, Nourinia A, Abd-Emami B, Negahdari B, Renaud P, et al. Design and fabrication of a nanofibrous polycaprolactone tubular nerve guide for peripheral nerve tissue engineering using a two-pole electrospinning system. Biomed Mater (Bristol). 2016; 11 (2): 025017. DOI: 10.1088/1748-6041/11/2/025017.
  13. Nawrotek K, Mąkiewicz M, Zawadzki D. Fabrication and characterization of polycaprolactone/chitosan-hydroxyapatite hybrid implants for peripheral nerve regeneration. Polymers (Basel). 2021; 13 (5): 775. DOI: 10.3390/polym13050775.
  14. Park D, Kim D, Park SJ, et al. Micropattern-based nerve guidance conduit with hundreds of microchannels and stem cell recruitment for nerve regeneration. NPJ Regen Med. 2022; 7 (1): 62. DOI: 10.1038/s41536-022-00257-0.
  15. Sanchez Rezza A, Kulahci Y, Gorantla VS, Zor F, Drzeniek NM. Implantable biomaterials for peripheral nerve regeneration: technology trends and translational tribulations. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2022; 10: 863969. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.863969.
  16. Tao J, Hu Y, Wang S, Zhang J, Liu X, Gou Z, et al. A 3D-engineered porous conduit for peripheral nerve repair. Sci Rep. 2017; 7: 46038. DOI: 10.1038/srep46038.
  17. Sharifi M, Kamalabadi-Farahani M, Salehi M, et al. Recent perspectives on the synergy of mesenchymal stem cells with micro/nano strategies in peripheral nerve regeneration: a review. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12: 1401512. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1401512.
  18. Perrelle JM, Boreland AJ, Gamboa JM, Gowda P, Murthy NS. Biomimetic strategies for peripheral nerve injury repair: an exploration of microarchitecture and cellularization. Biomed Mater Devices. 2023; 1 (1): 21–37. DOI: 10.1007/s44174-022-00039-8.
  19. Vijayavenkataraman S. Nerve guide conduits for peripheral nerve injury repair: a review on design, materials and fabrication methods. Acta Biomater. 2020; 106: 54–69. DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.003.
  20. Antonova OY, Kochetkova OY, Taylakov ME, Kanev IL. ECM-mimetic nanofibrous scaffolds for stimulation of dorsal root ganglia axon guidance and Schwann cell maturation. ACS Appl Bio Mater. 2025; 8 (10): 9480–95. DOI: 10.1021/acsabm.5c01600.
  21. Antonova OY, Kochetkova OY, Shlyapnikov YM. ECM-mimetic nylon nanofiber scaffolds for neurite growth guidance. Nanomaterials (Basel). 2021; 11 (2): 516. DOI: 10.3390/nano11020516.
  22. Antonova OYu, Kanev IL, Kochetkova OYu, Rajhman EV. Iskusstvennyj nervnyj konduit s napolnitelem iz voloknistogo nanomateriala. Patent RF RU226161U1. Zayavl. 09.08.2023; opubl. 23.05.2024. Russian.
  23. Antonova OYu, Rajhman EV, Kochetkova OYu, Kanev IL. Nervnye konduity iz sinteticheskih biosovmestimyh polimerov. Izvestiya Instituta inzhenernoj fiziki. 2023; 4 (70): 86–92. Russian.
  24. Miroshnikova PK, Lyundup AV, Bacalenko NP, Krasheninnikov ME, Zang Yu, Fel'dman NB, et al. Perspektivnye nervnye konduity dlya stimulyacii regeneracii povrezhdennyh perifericheskih nervov. Vestnik RAMN. 2018; 6. Russian.
  25. Jiang Z, Zhang Y, Wang Y, et al. Multichannel nerve conduit based on chitosan derivates for peripheral nerve regeneration and Schwann cell survival. Carbohydr Polym. 2023; 301 (Pt B):120327. DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.120327.
  26. Puranik N, Tiwari S, Kumari M, et al. Advanced bioactive polymers and materials for nerve repair: strategies and mechanistic insights. J Funct Biomater. 2025; 16 (7): 255. DOI: 10.3390/jfb16070255.
  27. Wang X, Fu X, Luo D, Hou R, Li P, Chen Y, et al. 3D printed high-precision porous scaffolds prepared by fused deposition modeling induce macrophage polarization to promote bone regeneration. Biomed Mater. 2024; 19 (3): 035006. DOI: 10.1088/1748-605X/ad2ed0.
  28. Nocera G, Jacob C. Mechanisms of Schwann cell plasticity involved in peripheral nerve repair after injury. Cell Mol Life Sci. 2020; 77 (20): 3977–89. DOI: 10.1007/s00018-020-03516-9.
  29. Stocco E, Barbon S, Zamuner A, et al. Self-assembling peptides for sciatic nerve regeneration: a review of conduit microenvironment modeling strategies in preclinical studies. Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025; 13: 1637189. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2025.1637189.
  30. Sandoval-Castellanos AM, Claeyssens F, Haycock JW. Biomimetic surface delivery of NGF and BDNF to enhance neurite outgrowth. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2020; 117 (10): 3124–35. DOI: 10.1002/bit.27466.