2016 / 02

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2016-02-03
Copyright: © 2017 by the authors. Licensee: Pirogov University.
This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Studying the ability to control human phantom fingers in P300 brain-computer interface

Kaplan AYa1,2, Zhigulskaya DD1, Kiriyanov DA1
About authors

1 Laboratory for Neurophysiology and Nero-Computer Interfaces, Faculty of Biology,
Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

2 Laboratory for Brain-Machine Interfaces and Applied Neuroengineering,
Lobachevsky National Research State University of Nizhny Novgorod, Nizhny Novgorod, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Alexandr Kaplan
Leninskie gory, d. 1, str. 12, Moscow, Russia, 117234; ur.liam@nalpaka

About paper

Funding: this work was partially supported by the Skolkovo Foundation, grant no. 1110034, and the Russian Science Foundation, grant no. 15-19-20053.

Received: 2016-04-11 Accepted: 2016-04-15 Published online: 2017-01-05
|
  1. Kaplan AYa. Nerofiziologicheskie osnovaniya i prakticheskie realizatsii tehnologii mozg-mashinnykh interfeisov v nevrologicheskoi reabilitatsii. Hum Physiol. 2016; 42 (1): 118–27. Russian.
  2. Mokienko OA, Chernikova LA, Frolov AA, Bobrov PD. [Motor imagery and its practical application]. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 2013 Mar–Apr; 63 (2): 195–204. Russian.
  3. Park J, Lee N, Cho M, Kim D, Yang Y. Effects of mental practice on stroke patients' upper extremity function and daily activity performance. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Apr; 27 (4): 1075–7.
  4. Kho AY, Liu KP, Chung RC. Meta-analysis on the effect of mental imagery on motor recovery of the hemiplegic upper extremity function. Aust Occup Ther J. 2014 Apr; 61 (2): 38–48.
  5. Bernshtein NA. Fiziologiya dvizhenii i aktivnost'. Gazenko OG, editor. Moscow: Nauka; 1990. 494 p. Russian.
  6. Skvortsova VI,. Krylov VV. Gemorragicheskii insul't: Prakticheskoe rukovodstvo. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2005. 160 p. Russian.
  7. Hara Y. Brain plasticity and rehabilitation in stroke patients. J Nippon Med Sch. 2015; 82 (1): 4–13.
  8. Mokienko OA, Chervyakov AV, Kulikova SN, Bobrov PD, Chernikova LA, Frolov AA, et al. Increased motor cortex excitability during motor imagery in brain-computer interface trained subjects. Front Comput Neurosci. 2013 Nov 22; 7: 168.
  9. Yuan H, He B. Brain-computer interfaces using sensorimotor rhythms: current state and future perspectives. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2014 May; 61 (5): 1425–35.
  10. Vasil'ev AN, Liburkina SP, Kaplan AYa. Lateralizatsiya patternov EEG u cheloveka pri predstavlenii dvizhenii rukami v interfeise mozg–komp'yuter. Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova. 2016; 66 (3): 1–11. Russian.
  11. Machado S, Lattari E, de Sá AS, Rocha NB, Yuan TF, Paes F, et al. Is mental practice an effective adjunct therapeutic strategy for upper limb motor restoration after stroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. CNS Neurol Disord Drug Targets. 2015; 14 (5): 567–75.
  12. Frolov AA, Biryukova EV, Bobrov PD, Mokienko OA, Platonov AK, Pryanichnikov VE, et al. Printsipy neiroreabilitatsii, osnovannye na ispol'zovanii interfeisa “mozg-komp'yuter” i biologicheski adekvatnogo upravleniya ekzoskeletonom. Hum Physiol. 2013; 39 (2): 99–105. Russian.
  13. Powers JC, Bieliaieva K, Wu S, Nam CS. The Human Factors and Ergonomics of P300-Based Brain-Computer Interfaces. Brain Sci. 2015 Aug 10; 5 (3): 318–56.
  14. Bamdad M, Zarshenas H, Auais MA. Application of BCI systems in neurorehabilitation: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015; 10 (5): 355–64.
  15. Kaplan AY, Shishkin SL, Ganin IP, Basyul IA, Zhigalov AY. Adapting the P300-based brain-computer interface for gaming: a review. IEEE Trans Comput Intell AI Games (Special Issue on Brain/Neuronal-Computer Games Interfaces and Interaction). 2013; 5 (2): 141–149.
  16. Cipresso P, Carelli L, Solca F, Meazzi D, Meriggi P, Poletti B, et al. The use of P300-based BCIs in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: from augmentative and alternative communication to cognitive assessment. Brain Behav. 2012 Jul; 2 (4): 479–98.
  17. Botvinick M, Cohen J. Rubber hands 'feel' touch that eyes see. Nature. 1998 Feb 19; 391 (6669): 756.
  18. Kammers MP, de Vignemont F, Verhagen L, Dijkerman HC. The rubber hand illusion in action. Neuropsychologia. 2009 Jan; 47 (1): 204–11.
  19. Kalckert A, Ehrsson HH. The moving rubber hand illusion revisited: comparing movements and visuotactile stimulation to induce illusory ownership. Conscious Cogn. 2014 May; 26: 117–32.
  20. Rizzolatti G, Fogassi L, Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2001 Sep; 2 (9): 661–70.
  21. Gatti R, Tettamanti A, Gough PM, Riboldi E, Marinoni L, Buccino G. Action observation versus motor imagery in learning a complex motor task: a short review of literature and a kinematics study. Neurosci Lett. 2013 Apr 12; 540: 37–42.