2019 / 02

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2019.022

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Adapting the p300 brain-computer interface technology to assess condition of anorexia nervosa patients

Ganin IP1, Kosichenko EA1, Sokolov AV2,3, Ioannisyanc OM2, Arefev IM2, Basova AYa2,3, Kaplan AYa1
About authors

1 Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia

2 Scientific-practical Children's and Adolescents Mental Health Center n.a. G. Sukhareva, Moscow, Russia

3 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Ilya P. Ganin
Leninskie gory 1, bl. 12, ap. 246, Moscow, 119234; ur.liam@ninagpi

About paper

Author contribution: all authors participated in the experiment planning; Ganin IP — immediate research activities, data analysis and interpretation, literature analysis, manuscript authoring; Kosichenko EA — immediate research activities, literature analysis, data analysis; Sokolov AV — immediate research activities, data interpretation, text editing; Ioannisyanc OM — diagnosing and selection of patients for the study; Arefev IM — support of experiments, data interpretation; Basova AYa — data interpretation, text editing; Kaplan AYa — data interpretation.

Received: 2018-10-08 Accepted: 2019-03-27 Published online: 2019-04-10
|
  1. McFarland DJ, Vaughan TM. BCI in practice. Progress in brain research. 2016; 228: 389404. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2016.06.005.
  2. Wolpaw JR. Brain-computer interfaces as new brain output pathways. J Physiol. 2007; 579 (3): 613–9. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2006.125948.
  3. Alqasemi R, Dubey R. A 9-DoF Wheelchair-Mounted Robotic Arm System: Design, Control, Brain-Computer Interfacing, and Testing. Journal of Advances in Robot Manipulators In Tech. 2010: 51–78. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5772/9678.
  4. Lopes AC, Pires G, Vaz L, Nunes U. Wheelchair navigation assisted by human-machine shared-control and a P300-based brain computer interface. International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). 2011: 2438–44. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1109/iros.2011.6094748.
  5. Vidaurre C, Klauer C, Schauer T, Ramos-Murguialday A, Müller KR. EEG-based BCI for the linear control of an upper-limb neuroprosthesis. Medical Engineering & Physics. 2016; 38 (11): 1195–204. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2016.06.010.
  6. Rezeika A, Benda M, Stawicki P, Gembler F, Saboor A, Volosyak I. Brain–Computer Interface Spellers: A Review. Brain Sciences. 2018; 8 (4): 57. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci8040057.
  7. Farwell LA, Donchin E. Talking off the top of your head: toward a mental prosthesis utilizing event-related brain potentials. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1988; 70: 510–23. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4694(88)90149-6.
  8. Asmaro D, Jaspers-Fayer F, Sramko V, Taake I, Carolan P, Liotti M. Spatiotemporal dynamics of the hedonic processing of chocolate images in individuals with and without trait chocolate craving. Appetite. 2012; 58 (3): 790–9. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.appet.2012.01.030.
  9. Asmaro D, Carolan PL, Liotti M. Electrophysiological evidence of early attentional bias to drug-related pictures in chronic cannabis users. Addict Behav. 2014; 39 (1): 114–21. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2013.09.012.
  10. Olofsson, JK, Nordin S, Sequeira H, Polich J. Affective picture processing: an integrative review of ERP findings. Biological psychology. 2008; 77 (3): 247–65. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006.
  11. Ohman A, Flykt A, Esteves F. Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of experimental psychology: general. 2001; 130 (3): 466–78. Available from: https://doi. org/10.1037//0096-3445.130.3.466.
  12. Ganin IP, Kosichenko EA, Kaplan AYa. Osobennosti jelektrojencefalograficheskih reakcij na jemocional'no znachimye stimuly v tehnologii interfejsa mozg-komp'juter na volne P300. Zhurn vyssh nerv dejat. 2017; 67 (4): 453–63. Available from: https://doi.org/10.7868/s0044467717040074.
  13. Singh M, Singh M, Goyal M. Selection of attribute combinations of ERP’s for classification of emotions along arousal axis. International Journal of Information Technology & Knowledge Management. 2015; 8 (2): 142–9. Available from: https://doi. org/10.141079/IJITKM.2015.801.
  14. Liu TL, Wang PW, Yang YC, Hsiao RC, Su YY, Shyi GC, Yen CF. Deficits in facial emotion recognition and implicit attitudes toward emotion among adolescents with high functioning autism spectrum disorder. Compr Psychiatry. 2019; (90): 7–13. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2018.12.010.
  15. Stavropoulos KK, Viktorinova M, Naples A, Foss-Feig J, McPartland JC. Autistic traits modulate conscious and nonconscious face perception. Soc Neurosci. 2016; (10): 1–12. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2016.1248788.
  16. Hatch A, Madden S, Kohn MR, Clarke S, Touyz S, Gordon E et al. Emotion brain alterations in anorexia nervosa: a candidate biological marker and implications for treatment. Journal of psychiatry & neuroscience: JPN. 2010; 35 (4): 267–74. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1503/jpn.090073.
  17. Bradley SJ, Taylor MJ, Rovet JF, Goldberg E, Hood J, Wachsmuth R, et al. Assessment of brain function in adolescent anorexia nervosa before and after weight gain. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology. 1997; 19 (1): 20–33. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1080/01688639708403833.
  18. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report A-8. University of Florida, Gainesville, FL. 2008.
  19. Meijboom A, Jansen A, Kampman M, Schouten E. An experimental test of the relationship between self–esteem and concern about body shape and weight in restrained eaters. International Journal of Eating Disorders. 1999; 25 (3): 327–34. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1098-108x(199904)25:3<327::aid-eat11>3.0.co;2-5.
  20. Blechert J, Ansorge U, Beckmann S, & Tuschen-Caffier B. The undue influence of shape and weight on self-evaluation in anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa and restrained eaters: a combined ERP and behavioral study. Psychological Medicine. 2011; 41 (1): 185–94. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1017/s0033291710000395.
  21. Squires NK, Squires KC, Hillyard SA. Two Varieties of Long-latency positive Waves Evoked by Unpredictavle Audiatory Stimuli in Man. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology. 1975; (38): 387–401. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/0013- 4694(75)90263-1.
  22. Guger С, Daban S, Sellers E, Holzner C, Krausz G, Carabalona R et al. How many people are able to control a P300-based brain-computer interface (BCI)? Neurosci Lett. 2009; 462 (1): 94–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2009.06.045.
  23. Ganin IP, Kaplan AYa. Interfejs mozg-komp'juter na osnove volny P300: pred"javlenie kompleksnyh stimulov «podsvetka + dvizhenie». Zhurnal vysshej nervnoj dejatel'nosti. 2014; 64 (1): 32–40. Dostupno po ssylke: https://doi.org/10.7868/s0044467714010067.
  24. Nikendei C, Friederich HC, Weisbrod M, Walther S, Sharma A, Herzog W, et al. Event-related potentials during recognition of semantic and pictorial food stimuli in patients with anorexia nervosa and healthy controls with varying internal states of hunger. Psychosomatic medicine. 2012; 74 (2): 136–145. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1097/psy.0b013e318242496a.
  25. Sprengelmeyer R, Jentzsch I. Event related potentials and the perception of intensity in facial expressions. Neuropsychologia. 2006; (44): 2899–06. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. neuropsychologia.2006.06.020.
  26. Foti D, Hajcak G, Dien J. Differentiating neural responses to emotional pictures: Evidence from temporal-spatial PCA. Psychophysiology. 2009; 46 (3): 521–30. Available from: https:// doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00796.x.