ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Prevalence of risk factors for health and emotional well-being of teachers in the context of distance learning

About authors

1 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

2 Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, Moscow, Russia

3 Institute of age physiology, Moscow, Russia

4 Secondary school № 72 Ulyanovsk, Ulyanovsk, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Svetlana V. Markelova
Ostrovityanova, 1, Moscow, 117997; ur.umsr@vs_avolekram

About paper

Author contribution: Milushkina OYu — study management; Zhukov OF, Markelova SV, Lukanova OV — material collection, statistical processing, article authoring; Skoblina NA — literature analysis.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Protocol № 159 of November 21, 2016). Each participant signed a voluntary informed consent form. Adult population participated voluntarily, through filling in questionnaires online.

Received: 2021-03-19 Accepted: 2021-04-28 Published online: 2021-04-29
|

In 2020, with COVID-19 pandemic and quarantine measures in the background, over 1.5 billion children, adolescents and youth were switched to distance learning (DL). Distance learning implies interaction of teachers and students at a distance, with all the components of educational process (goals, content, methods, organizational patterns, teaching aids) factored in. Distance learning relies on the specific constituents of the internet technology [1, 2].

Schools were forced to switch to distance learning strategies, but their experience of application thereof was limited [3].

Studies by both Russian and foreign researchers and educators have shown that switch to the distance mode of learning entailed increased loads on all educational process participants (teachers, students, parents) [49], which caused disorders in general and distressed emotional well-being of teachers in particular [10]. According to the studies, 34% of teachers experienced anxiety during a pandemic and 8% exhibited strong depressive emotions. It was also established that women show positive correlation with fear and depression and negative correlation with optimism [10, 11]. The vast majority of education professionals are women [12].

Teachers who relied on information and communication technologies in their work during the COVID-19 pandemic noted that this form of work was a source of significant stress for them, which, as factored in the teacher success model based on the theory of self-determination, can cause emotional burnout [13].

The professional activity of a teacher involves close communication with students in an emotionally rich atmosphere. Emotional burnout is one of the possible fallouts thereof. Emotional burnout (EB) is a dynamic process that develops in stages, three of them. At the first stage, nervous tension rises from the atmosphere of chronic psychoemotional instability, destabilizing environment, increased responsibility, difficulties inherent to interactions with the given group of pupils/students. At the second stage, the person undergoing emotional burnout shows resistance, i.e., tries to develop protection against unpleasant impressions, with varying results. At the third stage, this person suffers depletion of mental resources, substandard emotional tone, both being the result of failure to resist at the second stage.

For teachers, DL means altered work and rest regimes, increased number of electronic devices in use, greater screen time associated with work (value several times as great as it was before DL), increased loads on the visual analyzer, musculoskeletal system. The way of life of teachers has changed, they were subjected to a significantly more intense neuro-emotional stress, and the loads on individual functional systems of the body have increased [14]. The peculiarities of organization of educational process in the DL mode, with forced self-isolation in the background, constitute an additional emotional burnout risk factor for teachers. This risk factor was only addressed in a small number of studies [15].

Thus, the problem of preserving health of teachers in the context of educational process intensification, growing reliance on information and communication technologies as part of the digital educational environment deployment, is of great scientific interest.

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of risk factors affecting health and emotional state of teachers engaged in DL, as well as subjective, teachers' assessment of the significance of these factors for health.

METHODS

We developed special online questionnaires to collect teachers' subjective assessments of their health, capability to follow a healthy lifestyle (HLS) when teaching traditionally (traditional learning, TL) and in the distance learning (DL) mode. The questionnaires were published as and distributed through Google Forms [16].

In 2019, we had 224 teachers fill in the online questionnaires during the TL period. In April 2020, during the DL period, we collected filled questionnaires from 619 teachers. The respondents lived in Moscow and the Moscow region, Yekaterinburg, Nizhny Novgorod, Voronezh, Ulyanovsk and other cities. Most of them were women. The average age of the respondents was 47.1 years. The questionnaires included questions aimed at collecting information about respondents' subjective assessment of their health; level of commitment to regular exercising (sports and other types of physical activity), eating at least three times a day, monitoring energy value of food; awareness about risk factors that can have a negative impact on health and emotional well-being.

Anthropometric measurements (body length and weight) were taken in 2019 during the TL period (45 teachers) and in 2021, when the DL period ended (72 teachers). Body mass index assessment followed the WHO standard, which considers values from 18.5 to 24.9 normal.

In February 2021, when the DL period has ended, we surveyed 72 teachers online, asking questions to collect data on their health status, anthropometric indicators, the influence of various factors on health and emotional well-being [17]. We also used V.V. Boyko questionnaire to identify EB in teachers and to establish groups of external and internal factors triggering it. The group of organizational (external) factors included work conditions and socio-psychological activity (chronic psycho-emotional stress, unclear work organization and planning patterns, increased responsibility for the results of functional execution, unfavorable psychological atmosphere inherent to the professional activity). The group of internal factors included inclination to be emotionally rigid, intense internalization (perception and experience) of the circumstances of professional activity, weak motivation for emotional return in professional activity [18].

Factoring in the identified health risk factors peculiar to work and life of teachers, we built a regression model that describes their subjective assessment of their health in points (subjective positive assessment of health at Y ≤ 1).

We calculated the odds ratio of developing overweight and obesity among teachers who adequately assessed and underestimated the health and emotional well-being risk factors.

Statistical data processing relied on Statistica 13.0 (StatSoft Inc.; USA), Student's t-test, χ2 test; the differences were considered significant at p ≤ 0.05.

RESULTS

Only a third of teachers (30%) of general primary and secondary education establishments considered themselves healthy.

During the TL period, every fifth teacher (21.4%) underestimated the health risk associated with lack of regular exercise sessions (sports and other types of physical activity), every third (28.6%) teacher underestimated the risk associated with having less than three meals a day, every second (55.8%) teacher paid no attention to the energy value of food consumed.

DL had a specific effect on the way of life of teachers. The majority of respondents (94.1%) reported decreased physical activity level; only half of them (56.2%) mentioned maintaining physical activity level at the minimum. During the TL period, every second teacher (45.5%) monitored his/her level of physical activity, while during the DL period it was only every third teacher (33.0%) (p ≤ 0,05).

Teachers examined when the DL period ended had their the average body mass index (BMI) at 26.9 ± 0.7, while during the TL period it was at 25.7 ± 0.7; every fourth (23.8%) had some degree of obesity, every third (38.1%) was overweight; about a third (38.9%) of the respondents mentioned getting sick more often during the DL period, and only every seventh (15.3%) teacher reported no sickness incidents at all.

After the DL period, only every eighth teacher (13.1%) reported lack of EB symptoms. The remaining respondents mentioned presence of certain emerging or established EB symptoms.

At the "tension" stage, every second teacher (45.9%) had a developed "experiencing traumatic circumstances" symptom, while every third (31.2%) exhibited the "anxiety and depression" symptom.

At the "resistance" stage, half of the respondents signaled high values of the "inadequate selective emotional response" (54.1%) and "professional deterioration" (50.8%) symptoms; a third of them noted "emotional and moral disorientation" (32.8%), "expanded emotional numbness field" (31.1%).  

At the "depletion" stage, every fourth teacher (22.9%) had the "psychosomatic and psychovegetative disorders" symptom manifesting or dominating. After the DL period was over, teachers listed the risk factors that, in their opinion, had an impact on health and emotional state (figure).

According to the teachers surveyed, the risk factors affecting health and possible EB onset during the DL period were: work intensity, checked by every second respondent (61.1%); low physical activity, checked by every third respondent (36.1%); inappropriate nutrition (29.2%); lack of timely medical care (29.2%). Every fifteenth respondent mentioned "lack of knowledge on disease prevention" as a risk factor (6.9%).

Teachers underestimating emotional well-being and health risk factors were 2.3 times more likely to grow obese (OR = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.22–0.70). We built a regression model that incorporates the most informative variables describing health status and EB development in teachers: age and gender characteristics, level of physical activity (p ≤ 0.05):

Y = 1.48 + 0.23X1 – 0.80X2, where X1 age and gender characteristics; X2 the level of physical activity.

The results highlight high hygienic value of physical activity as a controllable health risk factor.

DISCUSSION

The vast majority of general education teachers turned out to have no DL experience both in Russia and all over the world.

During the COVID-19 pandemic, school teachers did gain some experience against the background of need to adapt to the unprecedented DL process [1820].

Analyzing the results of distance learning, pedagogical community realized the need to investigate physical and mental health status of all participants of the educational process occurring without in-person contact. Psychologists and teachers, physicians and physiologists state that in the absence of immediate live interaction of students and teachers it is more difficult for the former to perceive, understand and memorize the material presented, with the neuropsychic load suffered by the participants of such educational process increasing severalfold, which calls for adaptation of educational material, teaching methods and forms to fit the DL requirements [2128].

The announced self-isolation regime, the switch to DL and the associated need to master information and communication technologies within a limited period of time changed lifestyle of teachers, increased their work hours and the intensity of work, which can be regarded as an additional risk factor for the teachers' health and emotional sphere.

This testifies to the lack of teachers' awareness of healthy lifestyle practices, non-adherence thereto in daily and professional activities, which, with the growing deficit of physical activity and work intensity, contributed to physical health disorders, obesity and excess body weight and disturbed emotional well-being. The study has shown the importance of physical activity as a manageable risk factor in the context of health disorders and development of emotional burnout in teachers.

CONCLUSIONS

This study allowed establishing the fact that teachers underestimate the health and emotional well-being risk factors. The situation was obvious during the TL period and deteriorated further during the DL period. We have shown the high value of an adequate subjective assessment of health and emotional well-being risk factors associated with physical activity, rational nutrition, the possibility of receiving timely medical care as components of a healthy lifestyle, as well as the high hygienic value of the level of awareness of healthy lifestyle practices health disorder prevention. The study underscores the high relevance of involving teachers in hygienic education and healthy lifestyles promotion activities. Such efforts will have a positive effect on their health and emotional well-being, including in the context of introduction of information and communication technologies into their professional lives, and will also increase the level of subjective assessment of the health risk factors.

The experience gained from long-term distance work exacerbated the existing problems resulting from the intensive introduction of information and communication technologies into the educational process, helped identify health and emotional well-being risk factors affecting all participants of the educational process, allows studying teachers' subjective assessment of existing risk factors, outlining priority areas for prevention efforts in the context of giving hygienic education to the teachers. Deployment of preventive programs for teachers, including those covering safe use of communication devices, work and rest balance, rational nutrition principles, optimal physical activity will not only help prevent deterioration of their health, preserve emotional well-being, but also increase their professional effectiveness and, consequently, the level of education received by their students.

КОММЕНТАРИИ (0)