METHOD

A bionic eye: performance of the Argus II retinal prosthesis in low-vision and social rehabilitation of patients with end-stage retinitis pigmentosa

About authors

1 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

2 Scientific Clinical Center of Otorhinolaryngology, FMBA of Russia, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Pavel V. Gliznitsa
Ostrovintyanova 1, Moscow, 117513; moc.duolci@pastinzilg

About paper

Author contribution: Takhchidi KhP — study design, literature analysis, implantation surgery, data analysis and interpretation; Kachclina GF — study design, literature analysis, data analysis and interpretation; Takhchidi NKh — manuscript preparation, literature analysis; Manoyan RA — follow-up observation, rehabilitation sessions, data collection; Gliznitsa PV — follow-up observation, rehabilitation sessions, data collection, manuscript preparation.

Received: 2019-06-04 Accepted: 2019-06-19 Published online: 2019-06-26
|
  1. Grüsser O-J, Hagner M. On the history of deformation phosphenes and the idea of internal light generated in the eye for the purpose of vision. History of Ophthalmology book series. ACOI. 1990; (3): 57–85.
  2. Loewenstein JI, Montezuma SR, Rizzo JF. Outer retinal degeneration: an electronic retinal prosthesis as a treatment strategy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2004; 122 (4): 587–96.
  3. Brelen ME, Duret F, Gerard B, Delbeke J, Veraart C. Creating a meaningful visual perception in blind volunteers by optic nerve stimulation. J Neural Eng. 2005; (2): 22–8.
  4. Ghodasra DH, Chen A, Arevalo JF, et al. Worldwide Argus II implantation: recommendations to optimize patient outcomes. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016; 16 (1): 52.
  5. Humayun MS, de Juan E, Jr, Dagnelie G, Greenberg RJ, Propst RH, Phillips DH. Visual perception elicited by electrical stimulation of retina in blind humans. Arch Ophthalmol. 1996; 114 (1): 40–6.
  6. Mills JO, Jalil A, Stanga PE. Electronic retinal implants and artificial vision: journey and present. Eye (Lond). 2017 Oct; 31 (10): 1383–98.
  7. Yue L, Weiland JD, Roska B, Humayun MS. Retinal stimulation strategies to restore vision: Fundamentals and systems. Prog Retin Eye Res. 2016 Jul; 53: 21–47.
  8. da Cruz L, Dorn JD, Humayun MS, Dagnelie G, Handa J, Barale P-O, et al. Five-Year Safety and Performance Results from the Argus II Retinal Prosthesis System Clinical Trial. Ophthalmology. 2016 Oct; 123 (10): 2248–54.
  9. Chader GJ, Weiland J, Humayun MS. Artificial vision: needs, functioning, and testing of a retinal electronic prosthesis. Prog Brain Res. 2009; (175): 317–32.
  10. Tran BK, Wolfensberger TJ. Retina-Implant Interaction after 16 Months Follow-up in a Patient with an Argus II Prosthesis. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd. 2017 Apr; 234 (4): 538–40.
  11. de Balthasar C, Patel S, Roy A, et al. Factors a ec ng perceptual thresholds in epirenal prostheses. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2008; 49 (6): 2303–14.
  12. Besch D, Sachs H, Szurman P, et al. Extraocular surgery for implantation of an active subretinal visual prosthesis with external connections: feasibility and outcome in seven patients. Br J Ophthalmol. 2008; (92): 1361–8.