ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Effects of the metaplasticity-based theta-burst transcranial stimulation protocols on working memory performance

About authors

Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Alfiia H. Zabirova
Volokolamskoye shosse, 80, Moscow, 125367, Russia; moc.liamg@aworibasajifla

About paper

Funding: the study was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (RSF), grant № 21-75-00040, https://rscf.ru/en/project/21-75-00040/.

Author contribution: Bakulin IS, Zabirova AH — study planning and design; Bakulin IS, Zabirova AH, Poydasheva AG, Lagoda DYu — experimentation and data acquisition; Bakulin IS, Zabirova AH, Sinitsyn DO — data analysis; all authors — data interpretation; Bakulin IS, Zabirova AH — writing the draft of the manuscript; all authors — manuscript editing.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Research Center of Neurology (protocol № 8-8/21 of 15 September 2021), it was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The informed consent was submitted by all study participants.

Received: 2023-03-24 Accepted: 2023-04-14 Published online: 2023-04-25
|
  1. Beynel L, Appelbaum LG, Luber B, Crowell CA, Hilbig SA, Lim W, et al. Effects of online repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on cognitive processing: A meta-analysis and recommendations for future studies. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019; 107: 47–58. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.018. PMID: 31473301; PMCID: PMC7654714.
  2. Lefaucheur JP, Aleman A, Baeken C, Benninger DH, Brunelin J, Di Lazzaro V, et al. Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS): An update (2014–2018). Clin Neurophysiol. 2020; 131 (2): 474–528. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2019.11.002. PMID: 31901449.
  3. Goldsworthy MR, Hordacre B, Rothwell JC, Ridding MC. Effects of rTMS on the brain: is there value in variability? Cortex. 2021; 139: 43–59. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2021.02.024. PMID: 33827037.
  4. Abraham WC, Bear MF. Metaplasticity: the plasticity of synaptic plasticity. Trends Neurosci. 1996; 19 (4): 126–30. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)80018-x. PMID: 8658594.
  5. Bakulin IS, Poydasheva AG, Zabirova AH, Suponeva NA, Piradov MA. Metaplasticity and non-invasive brain stimulation: the search for new biomarkers and directions for therapeutic neuromodulation. Annals of clinical and experimental neurology. 2022; 16(3): 74–82. Russian. DOI: 10.54101/ACEN.2022.3.9.
  6. Hassanzahraee M, Zoghi M, Jaberzadeh S. How different priming stimulations affect the corticospinal excitability induced by noninvasive brain stimulation techniques: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Neurosci. 2018; 29 (8): 883–99. DOI: 10.1515/revneuro-2017-0111. PMID: 29604209.
  7. Tse NY, Goldsworthy MR, Ridding MC, Coxon JP, Fitzgerald PB, Fornito A, et al. The effect of stimulation interval on plasticity following repeated blocks of intermittent theta burst stimulation. Sci Rep. 2018; 8 (1): 8526. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-26791-w. PMID: 29867191.
  8. Thomson AC, Sack AT. How to Design Optimal Accelerated rTMS Protocols Capable of Promoting Therapeutically Beneficial Metaplasticity. Front Neurol. 2020; 11: 599918. DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2020.599918. PMID: 33224103.
  9. Yu F, Tang X, Hu R, Liang S, Wang W, Tian S, et al. The AfterEffect of Accelerated Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation at Different Session Intervals. Front Neurosci. 2020; 14: 576. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00576. Erratum in: Front Neurosci. 2021; 15: 687972. PMID: 32670006.
  10. Gamboa OL, Antal A, Laczo B, Moliadze V, Nitsche MA, Paulus W. Impact of repetitive theta burst stimulation on motor cortex excitability. Brain Stimul. 2011; 4 (3): 145–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2010.09.008. PMID: 21777874.
  11. Murakami T, Müller-Dahlhaus F, Lu MK, Ziemann U. Homeostatic metaplasticity of corticospinal excitatory and intracortical inhibitory neural circuits in human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2012; 590 (22): 5765–81. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2012.238519. PMID: 22930265.
  12. Bakulin I, Zabirova A, Sinitsyn D, Poydasheva A, Lagoda D, Suponeva N, et al. Adding a Second iTBS Block in 15 or 60 Min Time Interval Does Not Increase iTBS Effects on Motor Cortex Excitability and the Responder Rates. Brain Sci. 2022; 12 (8): 1064. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12081064. PMID: 36009127.
  13. Vallence AM, Goldsworthy MR, Hodyl NA, Semmler JG, Pitcher JB, Ridding MC. Inter- and intra-subject variability of motor cortex plasticity following continuous thetaburst stimulation. Neuroscience. 2015; 304: 266–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.07.043. PMID: 26208843.
  14. Rossi S, Hallett M, Rossini PM, Pascual-Leone A, Safety of TMS Consensus Group. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120 (12): 2008–39. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2009.08.016. PMID: 19833552.
  15. Rounis E, Huang YZ. Theta burst stimulation in humans: a need for better understanding effects of brain stimulation in health and disease. Exp Brain Res. 2020; 238 (7–8): 1707–14. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-020-05880-1. PMID: 32671422.
  16. Chung SW, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Sullivan CM, Cash RFH, Fitzgerald PB. Impact of different intensities of intermittent theta burst stimulation on the cortical properties during TMS-EEG and working memory performance. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018; 39 (2): 783–802. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23882. PMID: 29124791.
  17. Mueller ST, Piper BJ. The Psychology Experiment Building Language (PEBL) and PEBL Test Battery. J Neurosci Methods. 2014; 222: 250–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2013.10.024. PMID: 24269254.
  18. Haatveit BC, Sundet K, Hugdahl K, Ueland T, Melle I, Andreassen OA. The validity of d prime as a working memory index: results from the "Bergen n-back task". J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2010; 32 (8): 871–80. DOI: 10.1080/13803391003596421. PMID: 20383801.
  19. Hoy KE, Bailey N, Michael M, Fitzgibbon B, Rogasch NC, Saeki T, et al. Enhancement of Working Memory and Task-Related Oscillatory Activity Following Intermittent Theta Burst Stimulation in Healthy Controls. Cereb Cortex. 2016; 26 (12): 4563–73. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhv193. PMID: 26400923.
  20. Viejo-Sobera R, Redolar-Ripoll D, Boixadós M, Palaus M, ValeroCabré A, Marron EM. Impact of Prefrontal Theta Burst Stimulation on Clinical Neuropsychological Tasks. Front Neurosci. 2017; 11: 462. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2017.00462. PMID: 28867993.
  21. Chung SW, Rogasch NC, Hoy KE, Fitzgerald PB. The effect of single and repeated prefrontal intermittent theta burst stimulation on cortical reactivity and working memory. Brain Stimul. 2018; 11 (3): 566–74. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.01.002. PMID: 29352668.
  22. Perellón-Alfonso R, Kralik M, Pileckyte I, Princic M, Bon J, Matzhold C, et al. Similar effect of intermittent theta burst and sham stimulation on corticospinal excitability: A 5-day repeated sessions study. Eur J Neurosci. 2018; 48 (4): 1990–2000. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.14077. PMID: 30022548.
  23. Boucher PO, Ozdemir RA, Momi D, Burke MJ, Jannati A, Fried PJ, et al. Sham-derived effects and the minimal reliability of theta burst stimulation. Sci Rep. 2021; 11 (1): 21170. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-98751-w. PMID: 34707206.
  24. Wu X, Wang L, Geng Z, Wei L, Yan Y, Xie C, et al. Improved Cognitive Promotion through Accelerated Magnetic Stimulation. eNeuro. 2021; 8 (1): ENEURO.0392-20.2020. DOI: 10.1523/ENEURO.0392-20.2020. PMID: 33452108.
  25. Wang L, Wu X, Ji GJ, Xiao G, Xu F, Yan Y, et al. Better modulation for risk decision-making after optimized magnetic stimulation. J Neurosci Res. 2021; 99 (3): 858–71. DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24772. PMID: 33617027.
  26. Wu X, Ji GJ, Geng Z, Wang L, Yan Y, Wu Y, et al. Accelerated intermittent theta-burst stimulation broadly ameliorates symptoms and cognition in Alzheimer's disease: A randomized controlled trial. Brain Stimul. 2022; 15 (1): 35–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.11.007. PMID: 34752934.
  27. Nettekoven C, Volz LJ, Kutscha M, Pool EM, Rehme AK, Eickhoff SB, et al. Dose-dependent effects of theta burst rTMS on cortical excitability and resting-state connectivity of the human motor system. J Neurosci. 2014; 34 (20): 6849–59. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4993-13.2014. PMID: 24828639.
  28. Poydasheva AG, Bakulin IS, Sinitsyn DO, Zabirova AH, Suponeva NA, Maslenikov NV, et al. Experience of Stanford neuromodulation therapy in patients with treatment-resistant depression. Bulletin of RSMU. 2022; (4): 31–7. Russian. DOI: 10.24075/brsmu.2022.044.
  29. Cole EJ, Phillips AL, Bentzley BS, Stimpson KH, Nejad R, Barmak F, et al. Stanford Neuromodulation Therapy (SNT): A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2022; 179 (2): 132– 41. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2021.20101429. PMID: 34711062.
  30. Bakulin IS, Poydasheva AG, Zabirova AH, Lagoda DY, Rimkevichus AA, Zakharova MN, et al. Use of a metaplasticitybased protocol of therapeutic transcranial magnetic stimulation in patients with progressive multiple sclerosis and spasticity: first experience. Neuromuscular Diseases. 2022; 12 (3): 26–35. DOI: 10.17650/2222-8721-2022-12-3-26-35. Russian.